Visualização normal

Antes de ontemCybersecurity News
  • ✇Cybersecurity News
  • CISA Vulnerability Review: Old Flaws Fuel Most Attacks Do Son
    The CISA Vulnerability Review finds known exploited vulnerabilities and decades-old software flaws drive most compromises across FY2024 and FY2025. Related Posts: Critical MongoDB Security Vulnerabilities Require Immediate Patching CVE-2026-73125: Ebyte NA111-M Flaws Let Attackers Fully Compromise the Device D-Link DIR-X1860Z Flaw Lets Attackers Change the Admin Password Without Login The post CISA Vulnerability Review: Old Flaws Fuel Most Attacks appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
     

ServiceNow Flaw Prompted Security Update After Researcher-Observed Activity, Not Active Attacker Exploitation

ServiceNow flaw

A recently disclosed ServiceNow flaw led to an emergency security update after unusual activity was identified in customer environments. While early reports suggested that unknown threat actors had exploited the vulnerability, ServiceNow has clarified that the observed activity originated from security researchers and customer security teams, not malicious actors. The issue, first widely discussed on Reddit, triggered concern across the cybersecurity community after evidence emerged showing that certain queries against ServiceNow instance data were possible under specific conditions. However, ServiceNow has now confirmed that no data was used or retained in a malicious manner. The company stated that the vulnerability affected certain customer configurations and could, in limited scenarios, allow an unauthenticated user to gain elevated access beyond intended permissions.

ServiceNow Flaw and Security Update Deployment

ServiceNow released a security update on June 5, 2026, addressing the issue across hosted customer environments.

“On June 5, 2026, ServiceNow applied a security update to hosted customer instances. The update concerned a security issue that could allow an unauthenticated user, in certain circumstances, to gain greater access to ServiceNow instances than intended.”

To reduce the risk associated with the ServiceNow flaw, the company modified endpoint configurations to ensure access is restricted to authenticated users only. At the time of disclosure, the issue had not yet been assigned a CVE identifier.

The vulnerability initially surfaced through Reddit discussions, where users raised concerns about potential exposure and questioned the internal response timeline.

No Evidence of Attacker Exploitation, Says ServiceNow

ServiceNow has clarified that there is no evidence of active exploitation by threat actors. Instead, the company said it identified unusual activity linked to research testing and customer-led investigations. According to ServiceNow, a subset of customer instances was queried during this activity, but the activity was not malicious in nature. The company also emphasized that affected customers were directly notified and provided with remediation guidance.

Scope of the ServiceNow Flaw and Affected Customers

The issue primarily impacted customers using the Australia platform release and some instances running pre-Australia configurations with specific changes.

“The security issue pertains to customers who are on the Australia platform release or made certain configuration changes to instances on releases prior to Australia.”

ServiceNow stressed that the incident was limited in scope and not a systemic issue affecting its entire customer base.

A company spokesperson reiterated that communication efforts focused on a small subset of impacted customers rather than a broad population.

Community Discussion and Reddit Timeline Questions

The ServiceNow flaw also sparked debate on Reddit regarding disclosure timelines and internal awareness.

One user, “d3s7iny,” claimed their security team had previously reported the vulnerability and alleged that ServiceNow had known about the issue since April 7, 2026. The post suggested the issue had been treated as non-urgent and scheduled for a later fix.

While these claims circulated widely online, they remain unverified and have not been confirmed by ServiceNow.

Bug Bounty Reports and Early Disclosure Signals

ServiceNow’s advisory confirmed that multiple bug bounty submissions were received shortly before the patch was released.

Between June 3 and June 4, 2026, customers reported a potential security issue through bug bounty channels that aligned with earlier internal findings.

The company also referenced a confidential report submitted on April 22, 2026, which described similar behavior affecting instance data access under specific conditions.

These overlapping reports contributed to the eventual identification and remediation of the ServiceNow flaw.

Clarification on Researcher Activity and Final Response

ServiceNow has since issued a public clarification, stating that the observed activity came from security researchers and customer investigation teams, not from malicious exploitation.

An official notification is available on the company’s trust portal: https://trust.servicenow.com/notifications/1205429e-fea3-4cbf-b37b-8cd3a4e07aef

The company emphasized that no customer data was retained or misused during the process and that the vulnerability was addressed through a targeted security update.

  • ✇Security Boulevard
  • Reflecting on Your Tier Model: CVE-2025-33073 and the One-Hop Problem n8n-publisher
    The False Sense of Security SMB signing on domain controllers has become standard practice across most Active Directory environments. But this hardening may have created a false sense of security. CVE-2025-33073 changes the calculus by removing the prerequisite of admin access, enabling NTLM relay attack Active Directory exploitation through unconstrained delegation. Domain controllers enforce SMB […] The post Reflecting on Your Tier Model: CVE-2025-33073 and the One-Hop Problem appeared first o
     

Reflecting on Your Tier Model: CVE-2025-33073 and the One-Hop Problem

27 de Março de 2026, 00:12

The False Sense of Security SMB signing on domain controllers has become standard practice across most Active Directory environments. But this hardening may have created a false sense of security. CVE-2025-33073 changes the calculus by removing the prerequisite of admin access, enabling NTLM relay attack Active Directory exploitation through unconstrained delegation. Domain controllers enforce SMB […]

The post Reflecting on Your Tier Model: CVE-2025-33073 and the One-Hop Problem appeared first on Praetorian.

The post Reflecting on Your Tier Model: CVE-2025-33073 and the One-Hop Problem appeared first on Security Boulevard.

  • ✇HACKMAGEDDON
  • CVEs Targeting Remote Access Technologies in 2025 Paolo Passeri
    The exploitation of vulnerabilities targeting remote access technologies to gain initial access is continuing relentlessly also during 2025, with initial access brokers, and in general opportunistic and targeted threat actors, quite active in leveraging software flaws to break into organizations.
     

CVEs Targeting Remote Access Technologies in 2025

7 de Outubro de 2025, 05:18
The exploitation of vulnerabilities targeting remote access technologies to gain initial access is continuing relentlessly also during 2025, with initial access brokers, and in general opportunistic and targeted threat actors, quite active in leveraging software flaws to break into organizations.
❌
❌