Visualização normal

Antes de ontem@BushidoToken Threat Intel
  • ✇@BushidoToken Threat Intel
  • UK Cybercrime Journal: ExfilSquad Emerges BushidoToken
    What HappenedIn mid-2026, an emerging cybercriminal group known as ExfilSquad launched a high-profile extortion campaign targeting prominent UK organisations across the public sector, education, and law enforcement, as well as other firms worldwide.Unlike traditional ransomware groups, ExfilSquad does not deploy encryptors or destructive malware. Instead, they operate as a pure data extortion group, stealing data and threatening to publish it on their onion-based Data Leak Site (DLS) if a ransom
     

UK Cybercrime Journal: ExfilSquad Emerges

2 de Setembro de 2026, 06:00

What Happened

  • In mid-2026, an emerging cybercriminal group known as ExfilSquad launched a high-profile extortion campaign targeting prominent UK organisations across the public sector, education, and law enforcement, as well as other firms worldwide.
  • Unlike traditional ransomware groups, ExfilSquad does not deploy encryptors or destructive malware. Instead, they operate as a pure data extortion group, stealing data and threatening to publish it on their onion-based Data Leak Site (DLS) if a ransom is not paid.
  • Several prominent UK entities have confirmed breaches linked to the group:
    • UK Department for Education (DfE): Approximately 600,000 records stolen from its Help Portal containing parent and staff contact details (names, emails, phone numbers, job titles), plus around 7,000 records from the Turing Portal.
    • Police National Legal Database (PNLD): Stole 1.9 GB of data (around 135,000 records) containing contact information for over 100,000 serving police officers, staff, and criminal justice professionals, alongside around 21,000 "Ask the Police" public inquiry records.
    • Newcastle University: Approximately 440,000 records compromised containing applicant and student contact information, personally identifiable information (PII), and admissions database records caused by a technical configuration flaw connecting to an admissions system.
  • Analysis of the details left on the data leak site revealed that ExfilSquad's primary attack vector involves exploiting misconfigurations in cloud portals, customer relationship management (CRM) platforms, internal case management systems, as well as Microsoft Power Pages data tables left publicly accessible without proper authentication.
  • To force compliance and prove their claims are real, ExfilSquad uploaded multi-gigabyte torrent files for each victim to their TOR leak site. Resecurity noted that ExfilSquad assigns a distinct Torrent Tracker and initial Web Seed per victim.

Analyst Comment

While ExfilSquad is a new group, they appear to be already experienced at running these types of attacks, suggesting they have a history of cybercrime. Plus, ExfilSquad’s recent campaign highlights the growing trend of transitioning from file-encrypting ransomware to extortion driven entirely by cloud and SaaS misconfigurations. Organisations that have invested in defending against endpoint-based threats are often leaving critical business application interfaces exposed.

SaaS platforms continue to be primary targets of English-speaking cybercrime communities. In recent years,  customers of major SaaS providers, such as Salesloft, Salesforce, and Snowflake have all been extorted. Microsoft Power Pages portals, CRM databases, and customer support helpdesks frequently hold vast repositories of sensitive contact data and interaction histories. When internet-facing API endpoints or data table permissions are left unauthenticated or unpatched, cybercriminals can systematically scrape massive volumes of data without ever needing to drop a payload or escalate privileges internally.

ExfilSquad’s reliance on torrent distribution further amplifies reputational and operational damage. While gangs like LockBit, Clop, and Akira have previously utilised torrents, ExfilSquad’s operational twist of assigning unique Torrent Trackers and dedicated Web Seeds to individual victims ensures that leaked files distribute rapidly across P2P networks, making it extremely difficult to perform a takedown.

While ExfilSquad’s breaches have largely compromised contact directories and administrative support records, the real-world risks remain significant. Exposing work emails, names, and organisational structures for over 100,000 police officers and civil servants poses distinct social engineering, spear-phishing, and physical security concerns that impacted institutions will have to manage long after the breach occurs.

Defensive Takeaways

  • Audit Microsoft Power Pages and Public SaaS Tables: Regularly review public data table permissions, web API settings, and unauthenticated browser views across Microsoft Power Pages, CRMs, and customer support portals to ensure backend data tables are not exposed to the public internet.
  • Harden CRM and Case Management Integrations: Treat external-facing admissions portals, helpdesks, and case management systems as high-risk platforms. Implement strict access controls, conduct routine configuration audits, and enforce proper API token security.
  • Deploy External Attack Surface Management (EASM): Utilise continuous external attack surface scanning to detect newly exposed web endpoints, misconfigured database connectors, and publicly exposed storage buckets before malicious actors locate them.
  • Incorporate Pure Extortion into Incident Response Plans: Security teams must adapt incident response playbooks for data-theft-only scenarios. Organisations may seek to establish protocols for monitoring peer-to-peer (P2P) networks and managing public disclosures when stolen data is distributed via torrents.

Relevant Sources

  1. https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2026/security/newcastle-university-data-breach-exfilsquad
  2. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/who-are-exfilsquad-hackers-cyberattacks-dtzhvvzgj
  3. https://www.ncl.ac.uk/press/articles/latest/2026/07/statementonpotentialunauthoriseddataaccess/
  4. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq6dmgrp21po
  5. https://www.pnld.co.uk/article/?id=7ebf3c0e-598e-f111-8077-7ced8d3aa78f

Relevant CTI Sources

  1. https://www.ransomware.live/group/ExfilSquad
  2. https://www.resecurity.com/blog/article/exfilsquad-targets-new-victims-shares-data-via-torrents
  3. https://socradar.io/blog/dark-web-profile-exfilsquad/
  4. https://www.sans.org/blog/hunting-saas-threats-insights-for589-course-cybercriminal-campaigns

  • ✇@BushidoToken Threat Intel
  • UK Cybercrime Journal: Arup Group Breached by FulcrumSec BushidoToken
     What Happened:On 10 May 2026, the UK-based firm Arup Group was listed as a victim on the Tor data leak site of FulcrumSec. On their Tor data leak site, FulcrumSec stated that they have exposed 700GB of GitHub repos and 2TB of Azure and AWS S3 cloud, plus database backups.Other types of data the adversary claims to have stolen includes Neuron BMS client databases, Odoo ERP data, A66 landowner files, Apple code-signing certificates with plaintext passwords, a Google Cloud Platform (GCP) project w
     

UK Cybercrime Journal: Arup Group Breached by FulcrumSec

10 de Junho de 2026, 04:00

 


What Happened:

  • On 10 May 2026, the UK-based firm Arup Group was listed as a victim on the Tor data leak site of FulcrumSec. 
  • On their Tor data leak site, FulcrumSec stated that they have exposed 700GB of GitHub repos and 2TB of Azure and AWS S3 cloud, plus database backups.
  • Other types of data the adversary claims to have stolen includes Neuron BMS client databases, Odoo ERP data, A66 landowner files, Apple code-signing certificates with plaintext passwords, a Google Cloud Platform (GCP) project with production payment gateway credentials, and the source code of ArupCompute and Oasys. 
  • The FulcrumSec operators also claimed to have spent over half a year analysing the data and went through “email correspondence” with the company before publishing the stolen data.
  • On the victim post, FulcrumSec wrote a detailed incident breakdown. In it, they stated they gained initial access in September 2025 via a GitHub personal access token found hardcoded in a JavaScript file on a forgotten subdomain, which provided access to over 10,000 private GitHub repositories belonging to Arup Group.
  • From there, they scanned the repositories and found additional hardcoded tokens, API keys, and passwords for AWS, Azure, and databases.
  • The adversary stated that Arup detected the Github and Azure Storage intrusions approximately six weeks after they happened and rotated the credentials, but it was too late as the data had been exfiltrated. 
  • FulcrumSec also stated they pivoted into the AWS infrastructure using keys they had found belonging to Arup’s subsidiary Neuron.
  • FulcrumSec allegedly waited until April 2026 to contact their victim, Arup Group, due to the time it took to analyse the vast amounts of stolen data.
  • Impacted client organisations of Arup Group were also mentioned in the post, such as Disney and several other Hong Kong companies. The adversary reportedly uncovered Amazon data center seismic fragility data, British Petroleum (BP) site selection coordinates, and Queensferry Crossing internal documents as well.
  • Critically for the UK, the breached data exposed up to 62 HS2 related GitHub repositories. This involved Euston Station pile design files, ground movement assessments, over 14,000 sensor monitoring records, 48 archaeological site GPS coordinates (including Jones Hill Wood, a sensitive site for environmentalists), as well as confidential documents.

Analyst Comment:

Arup Group is a large multinational architectural design and engineering firm based in London who has been involved in constructing the Wembley Football Stadium in London, the HS1 Channel Tunnel Rail Link network, and the Eden Project in Cornwall, among other significant international construction projects.


Active since September 2025, FulcrumSec is a financially motivated data-theft-extortion group that specialises in rapid exfiltration of cloud-hosted databases by exploiting unrotated API keys and misconfigured cloud permissions.


This attack was noteworthy due to its highly targeted nature. FulcrumSec claimed they had access to Arup Group’s data for seven months and they clearly invested significant time to analyse the documents and spent weeks negotiating over email. Plus, to find initial access they also would have had to spend time checking Arup’s domains and Internet-facing assets to eventually find a single leaked credential to exploit. These types of targeted intrusions often only happen to large companies. This is because for it to be worth the cybercriminal’s time, effort, and risk to their freedom they will want a large ransom payment that only rich companies can typically afford.


FulcrumSec is an adversary worth monitoring due to the effort they put into their intrusions compared to other smash-and-grab ransomware campaigns. In October 2025, in a case documented by VX-Underground, FulcrumSec emailed detailed information about the breach they conducted with the aim of those details getting published and exert additional pressure on the victim.


Interestingly, FulcrumSec said the ransom they demanded was less than 1% of Arup’s annual revenue and was less than how much Arup lost to the deepfake fraudsters. This is a reference to Arup reportedly lost over £20 million pounds in 2024 after one of their Hong Kong employees was duped into sending cash to cybercriminals using an AI-generated video call. The fact Arup became publicly known for falling victim to a large scam potentially contributed to the adversary’s decision to select and focus them for this attack.


Defensive Takeaways:

  • Asset Inventory and Shadow IT Audits: Identifying the outdated unused domains with hardcoded credentials is standard best practices. All organisations must have processes in place to catalog and retire systems to avoid incidents like this. 
  • Hardcoded Credentials in Code: They way FulcrumSec gained access demonstrates the importance of using secret environment variables and features like GitHub Secret Scanning.
  • Implement Incident Response Procedures: Importantly, Arup detect the activity too late and it took them a staggering six weeks to rotate credentials (according to the adversary), which shows why having automated systems to check for unauthorised usage and reset tokens and all accounts is crucial to respond to such attacks.
  • GitHub Activity Monitoring: The adversary claimed they were able to clone thousands of GitHub repositories containing sensitive data without being detected. These types of activities are available to monitor and detect in GitHub Audit Logs. It’s also important to have a plan in place when suspicious activities are detected.
  • Third-Party Risk Management Programs: This incident also had some notable downstream impact. It shows why client organisations of another company’s services need to know what data and how much data is stored by third-parties for when such breaches occur. Knowing what’s potentially exposed will streamline the response to the incident.
  • Deception Tech: Arup could have implemented a boobytraps for the adversary such as the use of CanaryTokens inside sensitive documents. As the adversary spent time analysing the Arup’s documents before contacting them, if they open a boobytrapped document, then the incident could been detected much earlier and the damages could have been reduced.


Relevant Sources:

  1. https://x.com/darkwebinformer/status/2053281385582891437 
  2. https://www.ransomware.live/id/QXJ1cCBHcm91cEBmdWxjcnVtc2Vj 
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arup_Group
  4. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/may/17/uk-engineering-arup-deepfake-scam-hong-kong-ai-video


Relevant CTI Resources:

  1. https://www.ransomware.live/group/fulcrumsec
  2. https://x.com/vxunderground/status/1975629199323853027 
  3. https://www.reddit.com/r/Scams/s/wfZ3Wp94mY
  4. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/lexisnexis-confirms-data-breach-as-hackers-leak-stolen-files/

❌
❌