Introduction

This blog is part of a cyber threat intelligence (CTI) blog series called Tracking Adversaries that investigates prominent or new threat groups.

The focus of this blog is EvilCorp, a sanctioned Russia-based cybercriminal enterprise known for launching ransomware attacks, and RansomHub, a prominent ransomware as a service (RaaS) operation run by Russian-speaking cybercriminals.

These two threat groups have been linked together through cooperation on intrusions and IOCs and TTPs shared by multiple CTI sources. The implication of this link is critical due to RansomHub being the most active ransomware gang and is working with a well-known sanctioned affiliate.

Who is RansomHub?

Active since February 2024, RansomHub is a RaaS operation formerly known as Cyclops and Knight and is run by Russian-speaking adversaries. It is currently used by more and more cybercriminals that are ex-affiliates of other RaaS operations. This includes the ALPHV/BlackCat RaaS and the LockBit RaaS, which have since shutdown or disappeared. This has made the RansomHub RaaS one of the most widespread ransomware families as of early 2025.

Due to having a high number of affiliates, the tools and TTPs observed before the final RansomHub payload is deployed can vary significantly. Each affiliate may have their own set of tools and TTPs to achieve the final objectives of data exfiltration and ransomware deployment.

Who is EvilCorp?

Evil Corp is an international cybercrime network sanctioned for orchestrating large-scale financial cyberattacks led by Maksim Yakubets. EvilCorp’s operations have evolved over time, expanding from Dridex banking trojan campaigns into developing ransomware like BitPaymer, WastedLocker, Hades, PhoenixLocker, and MacawLocker.

Notably, Aleksandr Ryzhenkov, was identified by the National Crime Agency (NCA) as a high-ranking member of EvilCorp and also LockBit affiliate. Ryzhenkov became a LockBit affiliate around 2022, contributing to over 60 LockBit ransomware builds and attempting to extort more than $100 million from victims. This discovery aligns with Mandiant’s previous reporting on EvilCorp shifting to LockBit as well.

The NCA also found that EvilCorp maintains close ties with Russian intelligence agencies through Yakubets' father-in-law, Eduard Bendersky, a former FSB officer, who is suspected of using his influence to shield the group from prosecution in Russia.

One of the TTPs that makes EvilCorp standout from the rest of the RaaS affiliates is their own affiliation to the SocGholish JavaScript malware (aka FAKEUPDATES). If ransomware deployment takes place following a SocGholish infection, then the attackers responsible for the attack will be affiliated with EvilCorp.

Reported Connections Between EvilCorp and RansomHub

On 15 July 2024, Microsoft shared a post on X stating that RansomHub was observed being deployed in post-compromise activity by Manatee Tempest (which is Microsoft’s name for EvilCorp) following initial access via SocGholish (aka FakeUpdates) infections (which Microsoft tracks as Mustard Tempest).

On 15 January 2025, Guidepoint wrote a blog on a new Python backdoor used by an affiliate of RansomHub. Notably, the new Python backdoor was delivered by SocGholish. Therefore, this Python backdoor is another potential artifact worth monitoring for its connection to known EvilCorp-related malware.

The next day, on 16 January 2025, Google shared a report on EvilCorp (which Google tracks as UNC2165) that disclosed numerous tools and malware families they have been using to deliver RansomHub, including a Python backdoor dubbed VIPERTUNNEL (see the image below). The presence of a Python backdoor following a SocGholish infection is notable TTP that overlaps with the Guidepoint blog on RansomHub.

On 14 March 2025, Trend Micro disclosed further details that also confirmed the SocGholish malware is leading to the deployment of RansomHub ransomware. The operators of SocGholish are tracked as Water Scylla by Trend Micro. The operators distribute SocGholish via the Keitaro Traffic Direction System (TDS), a legitimate service used for marketing campaigns. Trend Micro also observed SocGholish dropping the same custom Python backdoor (aka VIPERTUNNEL) as well.

So What?

EvilCorp has been under US sanctions since 2019, making it illegal for affected organisations to pay ransoms to them without facing potential fines from the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Despite these sanctions, EvilCorp has continued its cybercriminal activities by adapting its tactics to include rebranding their ransomware and becoming an affiliate of RaaS operations, such as LockBit and RansomHub. 

The key indicator of EvilCorp's involvement in ransomware attacks continues to be the use of the SocGholish malware, which employs drive-by downloads masquerading as web browser software updates to gain initial access to systems.

EvilCorp’s affiliation with RansomHub raises the possibilities that RansomHub may soon face sanctions similar to those imposed on EvilCorp. Consequently, any victim that pays a ransom to RansomHub could become significantly riskier for cyber insurance organisations, incident responders, and ransomware negotiators, as they may inadvertently violate sanctions and face legal repercussions.

Given EvilCorp's prominence as a target for international law enforcement, its association with RansomHub is likely to draw increased scrutiny. This could result in RansomHub becoming the focus of future law enforcement actions, including potential takedowns and additional sanctions, further complicating the landscape for entities involved in ransomware response and mitigation.

There is also the increased likelihood that RansomHub will now rebrand. As we saw in the BlackBasta Leaks, ransomware groups pay close attention to the news, CTI reports, and even posts on X and even blogs by researchers. This association to EvilCorp and threat of sanctions is an issue for ransomware groups as it impacts their business model and makes earning harder. Therefore, by linking the two entities together CTI analysts can impose cost on these cybercriminals.

References:

1. https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa24-242a
2. https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/blogs/ransomhub-hits-powered-by-ex-affiliates-lockbit-blackcat-p-3703
3. https://www.ransomware.live/group/ransomhub#ttps
4. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm845
5. https://web.archive.org/web/20200213115628/https:/www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/international-law-enforcement-operation-exposes-the-world-s-most-harmful-cyber-crime-group
6. https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/hades-ransomware-successor-to-indrik-spiders-wastedlocker/
7. https://web.archive.org/web/20241004104429/https:/www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/further-evil-corp-cyber-criminals-exposed-one-unmasked-as-lockbit-affiliate
8. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2022/05/09/ransomware-as-a-service-understanding-the-cybercrime-gig-economy-and-how-to-protect-yourself/#DEV-0206-DEV-0243
9. https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/js.fakeupdates
10. https://x.com/msftsecintel/status/1812932754947911780
11. https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/security/security-insider/manatee-tempest
12. https://www.guidepointsecurity.com/blog/ransomhub-affiliate-leverage-python-based-backdoor/
13. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/threat_horizons_report_h1_2025.pdf
14. https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/25/c/socgholishs-intrusion-techniques-facilitate-distribution-of-rans.html
15. https://blog.bushidotoken.net/2025/02/blackbasta-leaks-lessons-from-ascension.html

Introduction to Infrastructure Pivoting

Pivoting on infrastructure is a handy skill for cyber threat intelligence (CTI) analysts to learn. It can help to reveal the bigger picture when it comes to malware, phishing, or network exploitation campaigns. Infrastructure pivoting essentially is the act of looking for more systems an adversary has created. The main benefit of this pursuit is the identification of additional targets or victims, more tools or malware samples, and ultimately new insights about the adversary’s capabilities.

If done correctly, being able to pivot on adversary infrastructure will be very useful during incident response (IR) engagements. For example, it may lead to being able to attribute the intrusion to a known adversary. This will help others during an IR engagement understand the level of threat posed to the victim organisation.

Receiving Threat Data

To be able to pivot on adversary infrastructure, threat data is needed such as the intelligence shared by threat reports put out by various researchers from public and private sector organisations. This scenario, however, involves relying on the analysis skills of other researchers to explain what the infrastructure is and when they observed it in use.

This blog will examine threat data provided by public sector organisations such as the Computer Emergency Response Team of Ukraine (CERT-UA) as well as cybersecurity vendors such as Deep Instinct, Cyble, and Fortinet. These organisations have shared indicators of compromise (IOCs) uncovered following analysis of adversary intrusion activities or upload to online malware sandboxes, such as VirusTotal, among others.

Introduction to the Ghostwriter Campaign

On 3 June 2024, Fortinet shared a report on malicious XLS macro documents leading to Cobalt Strike Beacons. Analysis of the XLS documents showed that they appeared to be targeting the Ukrainian military and linked to a known Belarusian state-sponsored APT group tracked as Ghostwriter (aka UNC1151, UAC-0057, TA445). On 4 June 2024, Cyble also shared a report on a similar campaign.  

In both reports, if the XLS was opened and the macros were executed by the target, a malicious DLL file was downloaded from an adversary-created domain. In Fortinet’s report, two similar “.shop” domains were mentioned. In Cyble’s report another “.shop” domain was also called out.

Overlapping IOCs

The first pivot on Ghostwriter APT infrastructure that will be demonstrated involves finding indicators of compromise (IOCs) such as domains and IP addresses that appear in multiple threat reports.

The fastest way to realize these overlaps is through continuous collection of reported IOCs into a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP). This will reveal IOCs that appear in multiple threat reports through tagging and sources of where IOCs come from. Eventually, one domain or IP address will get reported by multiple entities and the connection will make itself apparent.

In Figure 1 (see below) the domain “goudieelectric[.]shop” appeared in both Cyble’s blog and Fortinet’s blog. Analysis of all three domains found that they use the same generic top-level domain (gTLD), registrar, and name servers, as well as have a robots.txt directory configured. These common infrastructure characteristics indicate that all three domains were created by the same adversary.

Figure 1. Three similar domains appearing in two threat reports.

Domain Registration & Hosting Overlaps

When more IOCs are reported in other threat reports it is possible to link them to other known domains, this is due to adversaries reusing the same registrars, name servers, and gTLDs.

In Figure 2 (see below), Deep Instinct reported two more domains that could also be linked to the previous three domains through the mutual use of the PublicDomainsRegistry registrar, Cloudflare name servers, and the robots.txt file.

Figure 2. Five similar domains that appear across three threat reports.

Further, CERT-UA reported three more domains (see Figure 3 below) that could be linked to the infrastructure cluster through this same method as well. This pattern of behaviour is a strong indicator that these domains were created by the same adversary.

Figure 3. Eight similar domains that appear across four threat reports.

Finding Unreported Domains

Since the domains from the above threat reports were collected and linked together through overlapping attributes, it is now possible to use these attributes to find more domains that had gone unreported.

Using a VirusTotal domain attribute query, additional domains can be found by using the following registration pattern:

• Name Servers: CLOUDFLARE
• Registrar: PublicDomainRegistry
• TLD: *.shop

This revealed up to 24 domains that matched this pattern that were likely created by Ghostwriter, a state-sponsored APT group:

• backstagemerch[.]shop
• bryndonovan[.]shop
• chaptercheats[.]shop
• clairedeco[.]shop
• connecticutchildrens[.]shop
• disneyfoodblog[.]shop
• eartheclipse[.]shop
• empoweringparents[.]shop
• foampartyhats[.]shop
• goudieelectric[.]shop
• ikitas[.]shop
• jackbenimblekids[.]shop
• kingarthurbaking[.]shop
• lansdownecentre[.]shop
• lauramcinerney[.]shop
• medicalnewstoday[.]shop
• moonlightmixes[.]shop
• penandthepad[.]shop
• physio-pedia[.]shop
• semanticscholar[.]shop
• simonandschuster[.]shop
• thevegan8[.]shop
• twisterplussize[.]shop
• utahsadventurefamily[.]shop

Note: VirusTotal domain searches are only available to VirusTotal Enterprise users. There are other providers which allow you to search for domain registration patterns such as DomainTools, Validin, and Zetalytics. There also some free OSINT sites such as nslookup.io and viewdns.info that can be useful in certain scenarios.

Finding Related Malware Samples

Using the list of similar domains that were uncovered through the registration pattern search, it is then possible to find additional malware samples communicating with them.

This can be achieved by looking at domains in VirusTotal and checking the Relations tab can show communicating files as shown in Figure 4 below.

Figure 4. Additional malware samples uncovered via the VirusTotal relations tab

Using a VirusTotal graph can help to reveal every communicating file with every domain discovered through the registration pattern search, as shown in Figure 5 below.

Figure 5. All communicating files with every additional domain identified.

URL to the VirusTotal Graph: https://www.virustotal.com/graph/embed/gd2c04407d9ba4b75b2ce73d6155d166d3ef75eaf29894ff5ac287c90400072bc?theme=dark

URL to the VirusTotal Collection: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/collection/2aa6b36a717be8bc49f7925434ca40f3ecb9f628414b491da3e985677508ca08/iocs

Lessons Learned

In conclusion, it is important for CTI analysts to closer inspect the attributes of the IOCs they come across. It is not uncommon for state-sponsored APT groups to make such mistakes when creating their infrastructure to launch attacks from. By exploiting this fact, CTI analysts can learn much more about the adversary’s targets, capabilities, and the behaviours of the humans themselves behind such campaigns.

The importance of this type of work was demonstrated in December 2023 when the US Treasury sanctioned members of the Russian APT group known as Callisto (aka Star Blizzard, BlueCharlie, COLDRIVER, GOSSAMER BEAR). The real world identity of Andrey Korinets was revealed after he was sanctioned for fraudulently creating and registering malicious domain infrastructure for Russian federal security service (FSB) spear phishing campaigns.