Anthropic introduces Claude Message Threads to slash payload sizes from 800KB to 1.8KB and cut response latency by 35 percent across long chats.
Related Posts:
Cloudflare Launches Zero Wire Vulnerability Platform
TWCA Certificate Revocation Follows Serial Number Flaw
Raspberry Pi 16GB Price Surges Amid Memory Shortages
The post Claude Message Threads Cut Latency and Payload Size appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
Anthropic updated Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Code to block Claude video game cloning, preventing unauthorized remakes of commercial titles.
Related Posts:
Claude Message Threads Cut Latency and Payload Size
TWCA Certificate Revocation Follows Serial Number Flaw
Raspberry Pi 16GB Price Surges Amid Memory Shortages
The post Anthropic Restricts Claude Video Game Cloning in Major Policy Shift appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
Tech giants support a new AI training preference standard in robots.txt, giving publishers granular control over model training data.
Related Posts:
ChatGPT Violence Restrictions Tighten with Teen Safeguards
Google Project Suncatcher Achieves Orbital AI Inference
ChatGPT Codex Usage Limits Merged Across Plans
The post AI Training Preference Standard Added to Robots.txt appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
Anthropic unveiled the Claude Ultra subscription tier, removing 5-hour rate limits for verified accounts and bundling $200 in monthly API credits.
Related Posts:
ChatGPT Violence Restrictions Tighten with Teen Safeguards
AI Training Preference Standard Added to Robots.txt
Google Project Suncatcher Achieves Orbital AI Inference
The post Claude Ultra Subscription Debuts with No 5-Hour Limit appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
The new Claude CarPlay update introduces hands-free voice interaction for drivers, split-screen multitasking, and multi-account switching.
Related Posts:
Trezor Hardware Wallet Implant Found in Reseller Units
Microsoft 365 Storage Changes Reduce Family Cloud Quotas
Reddit Mandatory Login Tests Expand to Curb AI Scraping
The post Claude CarPlay Update Adds Hands-Free AI Voice appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
Cursor removed a malicious Claude Code extension backdoor. Learn how the Cursor Claude Code extension backdoor planted SSH keys on up to 5,000 developer PCs.
Related Posts:
INJ3CTOR3 FreePBX Malware Steals 17 Configuration Files for Off-Box Toll Fraud
CyberDakait Deploys Seven Android Trojan Families Against 17,960 Indian Banking Devices
Qilin Ransomware Targets VMware ESXi Servers and Healthcare Networks After Claiming 900 Victims in 2026
The post Malicious Claude Code Extension Injects SSH
Cursor removed a malicious Claude Code extension backdoor. Learn how the Cursor Claude Code extension backdoor planted SSH keys on up to 5,000 developer PCs.
Anthropic updated Claude Code permission modes with a toggle to suppress confirmation prompts for dangerous deletion commands during automated workflows.
Related Posts:
Trezor Hardware Wallet Implant Found in Reseller Units
Microsoft 365 Storage Changes Reduce Family Cloud Quotas
Claude CarPlay Update Adds Hands-Free AI Voice
The post Claude Code Permission Modes Add Dangerous Skip Toggle appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
Anthropic updated Claude Code permission modes with a toggle to suppress confirmation prompts for dangerous deletion commands during automated workflows.
Anthropic reiterated its Claude AI ad-free pledge in its IPO filing, promising investors and users that conversation integrity will remain uncompromised.
Related Posts:
South Korea App Store Fine Hits Apple and Google
PS5 Hypervisor Vulnerability Bounty Sparks Backlash
Report Slams Microsoft Edge Dark Patterns in Windows
The post Claude AI Ad-Free Pledge Affirmed in Anthropic IPO appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
Anthropic reiterated its Claude AI ad-free pledge in its IPO filing, promising investors and users that conversation integrity will remain uncompromised.
A scanner impersonates 32 AI bots, including OpenAI and Claude crawlers, to search websites for exposed credentials, private keys and cloud configuration files.
A scanner impersonates 32 AI bots, including OpenAI and Claude crawlers, to search websites for exposed credentials, private keys and cloud configuration files.
On October 27, Google issued a new Stable channel update for Chrome.Most users are on Chrome’s Stable channel. The desktop update brings Chrome to versions 156.0.8078.73/.74 for Windows and Mac and 156.0.8078.73 for Linux. The update includes 52 security fixes, including four rated Critical.On the same day, Mozilla issued Security Advisory 2026-118, which fixes 167 vulnerabilities. Firefox 159 also introduces several new features.Both updates will roll out over the coming days and weeks. How to
On October 27, Google issued a new Stable channel update for Chrome.
Most users are on Chrome’s Stable channel. The desktop update brings Chrome to versions 156.0.8078.73/.74 for Windows and Mac and 156.0.8078.73 for Linux. The update includes 52 security fixes, including four rated Critical.
On the same day, Mozilla issued Security Advisory 2026-118, which fixes 167 vulnerabilities. Firefox 159 also introduces several new features.
Both updates will roll out over the coming days and weeks.
How to update Chrome
The easiest option is to allow Chrome to update automatically. But you can end up lagging behind on updates if you never close your browser or if something goes wrong, such as an extension preventing the update.
If you don’t want to wait for the rollout to reach you, manually updating is easy. Open About Google Chrome from Chrome’s settings or Help menu. Chrome will check for updates. If one is available, click Relaunch to apply it.
To update Firefox, open the browser and click the menu button at the right side of the Firefox toolbar, then go to Help and select About Firefox. The About Mozilla Firefox window will open.
Firefox will automatically check for updates. If one is available, it will be downloaded. Once done, you’ll be prompted to click Relaunch. After Firefox restarts, it will be up to date.
After the update, the version should be 159.0 or later
Technical details
These Chrome and Firefox updates address a familiar problem: browser code mishandling memory while processing web content. Both releases fix use-after-free vulnerabilities, including flaws in page layout, JavaScript processing, and SVG graphics.
A use-after-free vulnerability occurs when a program attempts to access a memory location after it has been freed. That can cause crashes or, in some cases, allow an attacker to run their own code.
There’s another connection between these updates: both Google and Mozilla credit OpenAI Codex Security with finding bugs fixed in these releases. AI can help security teams examine browser code for weaknesses, alongside human code reviews and automated tests that check how software handles unexpected inputs.
Mozilla’s collaboration with Anthropic shows how AI-discovered findings can lead to fixes: researchers validated vulnerabilities before reporting them, giving Mozilla’s team reproducible bugs to investigate, repair, and deliver to users.
Browse like no one’s watching.
Malwarebytes Privacy VPN encrypts your connection and never logs what you do, so the next story you read doesn’t have to feel personal. Try it free →
The Anthropic S-1 IPO filing reveals $16.8B Q3 revenue, $750B in compute commitments, and a historic valuation target on Nasdaq.
Related Posts:
Microsoft Voluntary Buyout Program Targets 60,000 Staff
Denmark Ends Collabora Pilot in Blow to Open Source
Apple Blocks eMudhra Certificates Over Weak Key Flaw
The post Anthropic S-1 IPO Filing Targets Historic $2T Valuation appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
Introduction
AI agents and associated tooling are becoming increasingly common in corporate infrastructure. Agents can perform a range of actions with the user’s privileges, such as accessing data, running commands, and interacting with external services. This creates new security risks, especially when these tools are used without the security team’s oversight or well-designed policies.
Detecting, tracking, and controlling AI agents is becoming one of the most pressing tasks for security teams
AI agents and associated tooling are becoming increasingly common in corporate infrastructure. Agents can perform a range of actions with the user’s privileges, such as accessing data, running commands, and interacting with external services. This creates new security risks, especially when these tools are used without the security team’s oversight or well-designed policies.
Detecting, tracking, and controlling AI agents is becoming one of the most pressing tasks for security teams today. We closely follow technological developments and continuously update our solutions to respond to new threats in a timely manner amid a rapidly changing technology landscape. This post describes new expertise built into Kaspersky products that helps counter the threats posed by the proliferation of AI agents. We approach this problem from several angles.
First, you need to thoroughly understand the threat you are dealing with. To this end, we added profiles to the Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal that describe various AI agents and how attackers exploit them. At their core, AI agents are programs (processes) that run in the operating system on endpoints and can also launch other processes. This means that Endpoint Detection and Response solutions are among the key endpoint controls for this threat. These solutions detect the presence and launch of AI agents, track their activity, and identify potentially dangerous behavior. When needed, they also take action, such as stopping a suspicious process, blocking the activity, or isolating the host, to reduce the likelihood of an incident escalating. For this purpose, we developed specially adapted detection rules.
You can use Kaspersky Endpoint Security, now also available as Kaspersky Next, to control and restrict the launch of AI agents. This solution uses two components to detect AI agents and control how they are used. Application Control categorizes the application processes launched on endpoints, and Web Control manages access to specific categories of web resources for users on endpoints.
Finally, even harmless AI agents can contain malicious instructions (skills), such as those downloaded from unsafe external sources. Kaspersky Scan Engine analyzes installed applications to detect these threats and also checks LLM files for malicious code. Let’s take a closer look at these solutions and technologies.
Popular AI applications and services in organizations
Tools from Anthropic and OpenAI take the top spots in the September 2026 ranking of AI agents by popularity among Kaspersky users. This list is based on telemetry from Kaspersky solutions. It shows the number of users who had the relevant AI vendors’ products installed at the time of the study.
#
AI product
1
Claude
2
Claude Code
3
Codex
4
OpenCode
5
Zed
6
Wispr Flow
7
LM Studio
8
ZCode
9
Chatbox
10
Cherry Studio
The data shows that agentic systems, especially AI agents for software development, are the most popular AI applications. The TOP 10 also includes an application for running large language models locally (LM Studio) and a voice note-taking app (Wispr Flow).
According to open sources, these are the most widely used AI services in 2026:
Number of published vulnerabilities in LLMs, AI tools, and plugins with similar functionality, 2025–2026 (download)
* Data for previous quarters was updated and may differ slightly from previously published data.
Application Control and Web Control
To enforce the organization’s security policy for AI agents and other AI applications on the corporate network, Kaspersky products offer application control based on KL categories. These categories classify installed software and give you granular control over which approved applications can run in the organization.
Application Control analyzes the processes launched on endpoints, tracking which AI agents are running in corporate systems at any given moment, on which hosts, and under which accounts. Application Control also shows how long a given program has been in use.
This makes it easier for the Kaspersky Security Center (KSC) administrator to control applications. Administrators can use KL categories to allow or block AI agents inside the company for specific groups of employees.
Here is what this functionality looks like to KSC administrators:
KL categories available when configuring Application Control
For details on how to configure Application Control in KSC, follow this link.
In Kaspersky Endpoint Security (KES), Application Control can operate in two modes:
Denylist. In this mode, Application Control lets users run any applications except those blocked by Application Control rules. This is the default mode.
Allowlist. In this mode, Application Control blocks users from running any applications except those explicitly allowed by Application Control rules.
Below are the steps to configure Application Control to block AI tools.
Configuring Application Control for the AI Tools category in KES
With this setup, when a user tries to launch an AI agent, they get a notification and the agent doesn’t start.
KES notification about an attempt to launch an AI agent
The View applications drop-down list shows products for a specific vendor.
Similarly, Web Control lets you manage user access to web resources. If a user tries to open a denylisted website, KES blocks access and shows a warning.
KES notification about an attempt to access a prohibited web resource
When configuring access, the administrator can block websites that provide AI as a service.
Website categories
For more on configuring Web Control, follow this link. The help portal also provides information on website categories that can be assigned to resources to configure access control.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
To an EDR solution, an AI agent is a regular process. It has its own executable, a tree of child processes, and network communications, all of which need to be monitored for suspicious activity. An attacker can use an AI agent as an automation tool. An AI agent installed as a legitimate user tool can also be leveraged in a ClickFix attack, where it executes a malicious instruction received from an untrusted source, such as a document, web page, or email. That said, unsafe actions by an agent do not always indicate an attack. There may be no malicious intent in the chain at all. An incident can result from what looks like an ordinary instruction from a user who doesn’t fully understand the consequences of having it executed. The mere fact that an agent was launched does not reveal whether it is being used in an attack. That is why Kaspersky EDR (KEDR) uses both conventional behavioral rules and rules written and adapted to detect AI tools. The latter identify risky agent actions and settings, and help determine which AI tool was involved in suspicious activity.
Conventional KEDR rules detect the vast majority of familiar malicious techniques, including when performed by an AI agent. A suspicious PowerShell launch, persistence via Task Scheduler, or an attempt to steal credentials leaves clear, identifiable traces. These traces look the same no matter what initiated the actions. The rules analyze launch parameters, process relationships, affected files, network activity, and other telemetry events.
For example, in a recent Armored Likho campaign, we found signs that AI had been used to create loader and dropper samples, which were later compiled with NSIS (Nullsoft Scriptable Install System). The key telltale artifacts were icons in the scripts and excessive comments on every function, which is uncharacteristic of human-written code. In addition, the group continues to generate new modules for its BusySnake Stealer and BusySnake RAT samples. For example, the attackers used AI to develop a module that runs multiple checks for virtual environment artifacts and calculates a score. Depending on the score, the sample either runs or exits with code 0. Even though the initial access samples, payloads, and their modules were AI-generated, the commands they execute via rundll32 and PowerShell are detected by the shell_creation_by_rundll32 and suspicious_powershell_cmd_or_script_spawning rules.
So, for detecting an attack like this, it is not important who wrote the loader, the payload, or its modules: they are given away by the commands they execute, process relationships, and other traces of activity in the system. AI can be involved both in preparing the code and in carrying out the attack directly on the device.
In the latter case, the attacker uses the agent to carry out their tasks and lets it choose and run the required commands within the privileges it has. For effective protection, it is critical to link suspicious actions back to the AI tool and the conditions under which it operates. In KEDR, several specialized rules handle this task.
We have created separate rules for popular AI agents, ai_agent_*_access_to_sensitive_file_**, where * is the tool name and ** is the operating system. They generate alerts when an agent accesses files that contain credentials, tokens, or keys.
The ai_agent_dangerous_execution_mode rule detects agents launched with auto-approval of all actions (so-called YOLO mode) or with the sandbox disabled. These settings do not indicate an attack on their own, but they let the agent perform dangerous actions without user confirmation.
The suspicious_mcp_server_artifact rule triggers when MCP server scripts are created or modified in hidden, temporary, or cache directories. Attackers can place an MCP server in these locations to quietly connect it to the agent: through the MCP server, they can pass instructions to the agent, call third-party tools, and access the user’s data.
The llm_api_access_by_unusual_apps rule generates an alert when an application on Windows, Linux, or macOS connects to the API of a known external LLM service, unless this activity falls under predefined exclusions. This helps spot model access by applications that do not normally behave this way.
Some Kaspersky EDR rules tag events for investigation but do not generate alerts. For example, the ai_agent_**_execution rules flag launches of known agents on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The local_ai_model_artifact rule records the creation or modification of AI model files in typical application, runtime, and cache directories. These events reveal AI tools on the device, including tools that run on local models and never call an external API.
The Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal offers a large number of software profiles, including profiles of AI agents. You can sort them by the ai_ prefix:
AI agent profiles on Kaspersky TIP
The profile of an AI agent such as Claude Desktop includes a detailed description of the software, the privilege level required to run it, supported platforms, and threat actor groups known to use it. It also lists tactics and techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, with descriptions of the procedures the tool can be used for.
Claude profile on Kaspersky TIP
The description also lists ways to detect the software through standard system auditing mechanisms:
Windows: events from standard audit logs and Sysmon events
Linux: syscall audit events and Sysmon events
Network auditing: a set of protocols and the traffic generated by the software
The detection section lists the main artifacts the software leaves in the system: command lines, possible launch parameters, names of the services and scheduled tasks it creates, and the key network artifacts.
Detection section in the Claude profile
Hunt Hub
In December 2025, the Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal added Hunt Hub (HH), a repository of detection rules. This is a unique Kaspersky project, and we developed it in response to growing market demand.
This functionality is available in the Threat Landscape section of the portal. It gives analysts access to detection rules: their descriptions and their mapping to MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques, as well as to the associated cybercriminal groups.
In the Hunt Hub section, customers can explore the detection logic of EDR, NDR, and NGFW products, including the logic for detecting AI agents.
Rules in the Hunt Hub repository
The rule card provides:
Detailed description
Rule’s severity level, confidence level, and alert format
Detection tips
Description of possible false positives
Platforms the rule can run on
Tactics, techniques, and sub-techniques covered by the rule
Groups that use the technique covered by the rule
Detection logic that shows what exactly triggers the rule
Detection rule card in Hunt Hub
Kaspersky Scan Engine
Skills are a key component of the AI agent ecosystem. They’re prewritten sets of natural-language instructions that extend agent functionality. We previously covered the risks that malicious skills pose to agent users. A skill can require the usage of additional programs and services, come with helper scripts (for example, written in Python), or contain a malicious command embedded right in the instruction text. This means that adding skills to an originally harmless AI agent opens up several new ways for malicious code to enter the system. To prevent this, any skills obtained from external sources must be scanned. Kaspersky Scan Engine is well suited for this task. This is a cyberthreat detection and response solution that seamlessly integrates with various applications. It can detect malicious code in agent skills, associated scripts, and in files generated by running agents.
Detection of a malicious agent skill in Kaspersky Scan Engine
Trained LLMs come in many formats. Some of them (PTH, PT, PKL, KERS, and others) also store parameters and weights (training datasets). These files can also contain malicious code, so it’s critical to scan them before running and using them. Kaspersky Scan Engine scans potentially dangerous LLM formats for infected data. It can deserialize and analyze models to detect malicious code regardless of model size.
Detection of an LLM with malicious code in Kaspersky Scan Engine
Conclusion
AI agents are rapidly making their way into corporate environments: they help employees work faster and take on a wide range of tasks, but they also open up new opportunities for attackers. To take advantage of this technology without compromising security, organizations need to build multi-layered protection and minimize risks. A range of Kaspersky solutions can help with this:
Kaspersky TIP keeps you up to date on current scenarios in which attackers use AI agents, and its Hunt Hub section provides rules for detecting suspicious AI agent activity.
Kaspersky EDR detects AI agents in the infrastructure and monitors their activity on endpoints. If it detects potentially dangerous actions, the product can log the event, notify the SOC, and take response actions, such as stopping the process or isolating the host.
Application Control in Kaspersky products can fully restrict the use of AI agents within the company by using application categorization. The Web Control component can restrict access to AIaaS web resources.
Kaspersky Scan Engine can be integrated into various company processes to detect malicious code in any files, including AI agent skills and LLMs.
When companies combine the tools described above in a comprehensive approach, they can adopt AI agents in an informed way: with an understanding of the associated risks and effective means of minimizing them.
The Claude Duet AI agent debuts as a research preview on Opus 5.5, with a private VM and a planned $20 Claude Pro price.
Related Posts:
EU Opens Booking.com DSA Investigation Over Fake Listings and Phishing Scams
Gemini in Apple CarPlay Arrives on Google Maps
Chrome ClickFix Protection Scans Risky Clipboard Commands
The post Claude Duet AI Agent Takes On OpenAI Dots and Muse appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
The OpenCode security breach may have exposed stored third-party API keys for 1.4% of Console users. Revoke and rotate keys now.
Related Posts:
Sourcenext Data Breach Exposes 22.5M User Records
UpdraftPlus Data Breach Leads to UpdraftCentral Backdoor Attacks on WordPress Sites
Ricardo Data Leak Exposes User Contact Details
The post OpenCode Security Breach Exposes 1.4% of Console Users appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
The tech company says successful AI worms need more capability on less powerful devices, but current trends make that feasible by the end of the yearWarnings about what artificial intelligence might do in the future – together with alarming reports of what it has gotten up to already – are being issued so quickly that even security experts have difficulty triaging what to worry about.Yet a report this week from Anthropic’s offensive research team grabbed attention by describing a new, practical
The tech company says successful AI worms need more capability on less powerful devices, but current trends make that feasible by the end of the year
Warnings about what artificial intelligence might do in the future – together with alarming reports of what it has gotten up to already – are being issued so quickly that even security experts have difficulty triaging what to worry about.
Yet a report this week from Anthropic’s offensive research team grabbed attention by describing a new, practical threat, one devoid of human characteristics or apocalyptic musings. The red team, as such internal testers are called, said it created a malicious AI program that spread autonomously through internet-connected “smart” televisions and could do the same inside other ordinary devices. While machines running AI usually need a fair amount of computing power, the researchers said that their program split parts of itself among 15 televisions and was still able to function by using a bit of power from each.
Westminster appears to be waking up to warnings over AI safety, with concerns over its use by extremist groups and bad actors“I have this sense that, within a few months, AI is going to be all anyone is talking about,” said one cabinet minister, with an ominous stare.It was Labour conference, with everyone from ministers to activists jubilant at Andy Burnham’s takeover and a bounce in the polls after the change of leader. Continue reading...
Westminster appears to be waking up to warnings over AI safety, with concerns over its use by extremist groups and bad actors
“I have this sense that, within a few months, AI is going to be all anyone is talking about,” said one cabinet minister, with an ominous stare.
It was Labour conference, with everyone from ministers to activists jubilant at Andy Burnham’s takeover and a bounce in the polls after the change of leader.
Anthropic developed the Scion version control system to replace Git for its massive monorepo and high-frequency Claude AI coding workflows.
Related Posts:
Exchange Server Instability Tied to October Windows Updates
Russian Bot Traffic Resilient After Data Center Strikes
Google AI Plus Changes Drop Pro Model Access
The post Anthropic Replaces Git with Proprietary Scion Version Control appeared first on Daily CyberSecurity.
The FTC has subpoenaed OpenAI and Anthropic over potential consumer protection violations. An AI security expert explains the risks of enterprise AI agents.
The post FTC Demands Answers From OpenAI and Anthropic About AI Safety appeared first on TechRepublic.
The FTC has subpoenaed OpenAI and Anthropic over potential consumer protection violations. An AI security expert explains the risks of enterprise AI agents.
The EU is questioning OpenAI and Anthropic over AI agent security incidents, raising questions about the AI Act's reach into model development and testing.
The post EU Questions OpenAI, Anthropic Over AI Agent Security Incidents appeared first on TechRepublic.
The EU is questioning OpenAI and Anthropic over AI agent security incidents, raising questions about the AI Act's reach into model development and testing.