Visualização de leitura

FTC Sues Hims & Hers Over Health Data Privacy, Billing Practices

Hims & Hers lawsuit

The Hims & Hers lawsuit has put the telehealth provider under scrutiny after the FTC, along with Utah and California authorities, accused the company of deceptive billing practices and unlawfully sharing consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms. According to a complaint filed in federal court, regulators allege that Hims & Hers misled consumers about its privacy protections, enrolled users in recurring subscriptions without clear disclosure, and shared health-related data with companies including Meta and Snap.

The complaint alleges that the San Francisco-based telehealth provider failed to clearly inform consumers that prescription charges could be processed almost immediately after they submitted an online intake form, despite representing that they would first consult with a medical provider to determine an appropriate treatment.

FTC Complaint Alleges Deceptive Billing Practices

According to the FTC complaint, consumers interested in Hims & Hers services are required to complete an online intake form for review by a medical provider before receiving prescription treatment. During this process, users provide billing information after being assured they would not be charged unless medication was prescribed.

However, regulators allege that most consumers were not given a consultation with a provider before being charged. Instead, the complaint states that submitting the intake form automatically enrolled many users in recurring prescription subscriptions and processed charges before consumers had an opportunity to review or approve the treatment.

The complaint also alleges that Hims & Hers did not clearly disclose when prescription refills would occur, making it difficult for consumers to cancel subscriptions before the next billing cycle.

One consumer complaint cited by the FTC stated that they were told they would speak with a doctor within a few days and would not be charged immediately, but their payment was processed before any consultation took place.

Hims & Hers Lawsuit: Privacy Practices Under Investigation

The Hims & Hers lawsuit also centers on allegations involving health data privacy.

According to the complaint, Hims & Hers shared consumers' sensitive health information with advertising platforms such as Meta and Snap, despite assuring users that their medical information would remain private.

The FTC alleges that the company shared customer lists with advertising platforms and also used third-party tracking technologies that automatically transmitted website activity, referred to as "Events," to those companies.

Regulators argue that these practices exposed health-related information while contradicting the company's privacy representations to consumers.

Subscription Cancellation Process Questioned

The complaint further alleges that Hims & Hers created obstacles for consumers attempting to cancel recurring subscriptions.

Before 2023, most users could only cancel by contacting customer service through phone, email, or chat. Even after introducing online cancellation, regulators allege the company continued to make the process difficult by hiding the cancellation option behind multiple navigation steps. According to the complaint, consumers first had to select "add/remove items from order" before eventually reaching the cancellation page.

The FTC alleges these practices violate both the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act, which governs deceptive billing and subscription practices. Utah and California have also alleged violations under their respective consumer protection laws.

Hims & Hers Rejects Allegations

In a statement posted on X, Hims & Hers rejected the allegations and said the lawsuit ignores evidence provided during the FTC's nearly three-year investigation.

The company described the action as an attempt to generate headlines rather than enforce consumer protection laws and said it intends to defend itself in court vigorously.

Hims & Hers also stated that millions of consumers have relied on its services since 2017 and that its Privacy Policy explains how customer data is used. The company added that patients can choose how their information is handled and maintained that information shared with healthcare providers is used only to deliver care.

The lawsuit was authorized by a 2-0 vote of the Commission and filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The allegations remain claims made by regulators, and the court will ultimately decide the case.

California Hits General Motors With Record $12.75 Million CCPA Privacy Settlement

California Privacy Settlement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and a coalition of state and local enforcement agencies have announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors over allegations that the automaker illegally collected and sold drivers’ personal data without proper consent, in violation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The California privacy settlement marks the largest CCPA penalty in California history so far and represents the state’s first enforcement action focused on data minimization requirements under California privacy law. The case centers on allegations that General Motors shared sensitive driver information, including geolocation data and driving behavior, with data brokers Verisk Analytics and LexisNexis Risk Solutions between 2020 and 2024.

California Privacy Settlement Targets Driver Data Sales

According to the complaint, GM collected data through its OnStar connected vehicle platform, which offers emergency assistance, navigation, and crash response services. Investigators alleged that the company sold names, contact details, precise location information, and driving behavior data of hundreds of thousands of Californians to the two data brokers. Authorities said the data was intended to help create driver-risk scoring products that could be used by insurance companies when setting premiums. The investigation was conducted jointly by the California Department of Justice, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CalPrivacy), and district attorneys from San Francisco, Los Angeles, Napa, and Sonoma counties. Attorney General Rob Bonta said the settlement sends a clear message about consumer control over personal data. “General Motors sold the data of California drivers without their knowledge or consent,” Bonta said in the announcement, adding that the data could reveal sensitive details about consumers’ daily routines and movements.

CCPA Violations and Data Minimization Concerns

A major part of the case focused on alleged violations of the CCPA’s data minimization and purpose limitation requirements, which were added to California law in 2023. Under these provisions, companies are required to collect and retain only the data necessary for a disclosed purpose. Investigators alleged that GM retained driving and location data long after it was needed to operate OnStar services and later sold that retained data to third parties. Authorities also alleged that GM failed to clearly inform consumers about how their information would be used. The complaint stated that GM’s privacy policies suggested driver data would only be used to provide requested OnStar services and even claimed the company did not sell driving or location information. Investigators said the company’s practices contradicted those statements. San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins described modern vehicles as “rolling data collection machines” and said consumers deserve transparency about what information is collected and how it is shared. Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan J. Hochman said companies handling consumer data would be held accountable under California privacy laws, regardless of their size.

Connected Vehicle Privacy Under Scrutiny

The settlement follows growing regulatory scrutiny around connected vehicle privacy and automotive data collection practices. In 2023, CalPrivacy launched investigations into connected car manufacturers and their handling of consumer information. Public attention increased further in 2024 after a report by The New York Times highlighted how automakers were sharing driving behavior data with insurance companies. The reporting indicated that some consumers outside California had experienced increased insurance premiums tied to such data-sharing practices. California investigators later determined that California drivers were likely not directly affected through insurance rate increases because state insurance laws prohibit insurers from using driving behavior data to set premiums. However, regulators maintained that the collection, retention, and sale of the data itself violated California privacy requirements.

Settlement Terms for General Motors

Under the proposed California privacy settlement, General Motors must implement several privacy-related measures over the coming years. The company will be required to:
  • Pay $12.75 million in civil penalties.
  • Stop selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies for five years.
  • Delete retained driving data within 180 days unless consumers provide express consent for limited uses.
  • Request the deletion of driver data already shared with LexisNexis and Verisk.
  • Establish and maintain a comprehensive privacy compliance program.
  • Submit privacy assessments and compliance reports to California regulators and prosecutors.
The settlement also reinforces California’s broader push to strengthen consumer control over personal information under the CCPA. CalPrivacy Executive Director Tom Kemp said California privacy laws require businesses to collect only the information they genuinely need and to be transparent about how that data is handled. Alongside the settlement announcement, regulators also highlighted the state’s Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP), which allows Californians to submit requests to delete personal information held by hundreds of registered data brokers.
❌