At least 14 people connected to Serbia's student protest movement and opposition politics have been targeted with mercenary spyware since early 2026, the Belgrade-based digital rights organization SHARE Foundation said, in what it called the largest documented wave of such targeting in the country.

The group said the cohort includes student movement members, civil society activists, a member of parliament and a local councilor. Forensic analysis was independently confirmed by the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto and by Amnesty International's Security Lab.

Citizen Lab, in its own findings, said it verified an infection with NSO Group's Pegasus on the iPhone of a student activist who asked not to be named. High-confidence infection indicators span December 2025 through January 2026, delivered by a zero-click iMessage exploit that required no interaction from the target. Apple has since patched the underlying flaw; the fix shipped in iOS 18.4.1. Pegasus grants an operator access to notes, photographs and messages decrypted on the device, and can silently activate the microphone and camera.

Amnesty's Security Lab confirmed a new variant of NoviSpy, an Android implant first identified in Serbia in 2024, on two additional devices. SHARE said the rebuilt version was designed to evade the detection methods that exposed its predecessor.

Also read: Investigative Journalists in Serbia Hit by Advanced Spyware Attack

The circumstances of two infections are what elevate the findings beyond routine spyware reporting. SHARE said one NoviSpy infection appeared after police seized a student's phone during questioning, and another after private messages from that device were published by a pro-government media outlet. Donncha Ó Cearbhaill, who heads Amnesty's Security Lab, said the evidence suggests "infections are being carried out during detention by Serbian authorities."

Suspicion centers on Serbia's Security Information Agency, or BIA. Amnesty's December 2024 report "A Digital Prison" found earlier NoviSpy samples configured to send collected data to IP addresses associated with BIA servers, and documented the agency's parallel use of Cellebrite extraction tools on journalists and activists. In March 2025, Amnesty reported that two journalists at the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network were targeted with Pegasus.

The current cases surfaced through Apple's threat notification wave of Aug. 13, which reached users in 110 countries. The timing is politically loaded. The targeting overlaps with protests that followed the November 2024 collapse of a railway station canopy in Novi Sad, spans local elections held March 29 in 10 municipalities, and precedes October parliamentary elections widely read as a test of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party.

Ana Toskic Cvetinovic, a legal expert cited in the reporting, noted that deploying intrusive software without judicial authorization is unlawful under Serbian law. SHARE published an analysis of the domestic legal framework in January arguing the same. Criminal complaints filed over the 2024 cases remain pending before Serbian courts, with no resolution.

Also read: 7 New Pegasus Infections Found on Media and Activists’ Devices in the EU

NSO has been on the U.S. Commerce Department's Entity List since 2021.

Serbia is an accession candidate, the European Parliament has previously questioned the Commission over unlawful spyware use in the country, and the Commission published its 2026 enlargement country report in July. Amnesty's submission for that package raised surveillance directly.

Both groups urged at-risk users to enable Lockdown Mode on iOS or Advanced Protection on Android.

Ransomware’s biggest story in the first half of 2026 was not only about established names maintaining dominance. A newer player, The Gentlemen ransomware group, emerged as one of the most geographically active operators, expanding its reach across Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.  According to research from Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL), The Gentlemen became one of the top ransomware actors globally, demonstrating how quickly emerging ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) groups can scale through affiliate-driven operations.  Unlike older ransomware brands that rely on a narrow set of preferred targets, The Gentlemen displayed a broad targeting strategy. The group impacted organizations across Manufacturing, Construction, Healthcare, Government, and IT sectors — industries where operational disruption, sensitive information, and regulatory pressure create strong incentives for victims to respond quickly. 

The Gentlemen Ransomware Group Becomes a Regional Threat 

The group’s strongest activity was observed in Europe and the UK, where it was responsible for 144 ransomware attacks during H1 2026. The region’s Manufacturing, Construction, Healthcare, and Professional Services sectors were among the most affected, highlighting the group’s preference for organizations with valuable data and limited tolerance for downtime.  In Asia-Pacific, The Gentlemen became the leading ransomware threat, accounting for 114 attacks — nearly one-quarter of the region’s ransomware activity. Manufacturing was among the primary targets, with additional campaigns affecting IT services, Professional Services, Healthcare, and government entities.  The group also gained significant attention in the Middle East & Africa, where it accounted for 56 attacks, representing more than 26% of ransomware incidents in the region. Construction, BFSI, and Government organizations were frequent targets, demonstrating the group’s interest in sectors linked to critical services and economic activity.  South America also saw notable activity, with The Gentlemen responsible for 46 attacks, making it one of the region’s leading ransomware operators.  Also Read: One Country Absorbed Nearly Half of the World’s Ransomware Attacks in Just Six Months – The United States

Double Extortion Remains the Core Strategy 

The rise of The Gentlemen reflects a broader ransomware trend: encryption alone is no longer the primary weapon. Like most modern ransomware operations, the group relies on double extortion — stealing sensitive information before encrypting systems and using the threat of public exposure as additional pressure.  This approach allows ransomware groups to target organizations even when companies maintain effective backup and recovery capabilities. Stolen data can be leveraged for financial gain, reputational damage, regulatory pressure, or further attacks. 

What Makes The Gentlemen a Growing Concern? 

The group’s rapid expansion highlights the resilience of the RaaS ecosystem. Modern ransomware operations no longer depend solely on a single team’s technical capabilities. Instead, affiliates, access brokers, and specialized cybercrime services allow operators to expand quickly across industries and regions.  The Gentlemen’s activity also reinforces a key security challenge: organizations cannot rely only on historical threat rankings. New ransomware groups can rapidly become major players by exploiting exposed systems, purchasing initial access, and adopting proven extortion tactics.  For security teams, monitoring emerging ransomware operators and tracking changes in attacker behavior is becoming as important as defending against established groups.  To explore the complete ransomware landscape, including regional attack trends, targeted industries, and the activity of leading ransomware groups, download the full Cyble H1 2026 Cyber Threat Landscape Report. 

Strip away the geopolitics, the hacktivist noise, and the espionage headlines, and one number from the first half of 2026 stands out above everything else: 1,721. That's how many ransomware attacks hit organizations in the United States between January and June, according to new research from Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL). It's not just the highest total of any country tracked in the report — it's more than the next nine most-targeted countries combined.

Canada, in second place worldwide, recorded 179 attacks. Germany logged 155. The United Kingdom, 138. Add up the rest of the global top 10 — France, Italy, Spain, Thailand, India and Brazil — and the total still falls more than 600 attacks short of the U.S. figure alone. Out of 3,836 ransomware attacks CRIL tracked worldwide this half, roughly 45% landed on American soil.

Also read: Fairlife Ransomware Attack Hits Production Systems, U.S. Operations Suspended

A Single Region, an Outsized Share

Widen the lens slightly and the picture holds. North America as a whole recorded 1,981 ransomware attacks in H1 2026 — more than half of every ransomware incident Cyble observed globally — alongside 35 data breach and leak incidents and 9 initial access sale listings. The report describes the region as home to "a mature, persistently active RaaS ecosystem operating at high volume across a wide range of industries and geographies."

Two ransomware-as-a-service operators did much of the damage. Qilin, the single most prolific gang worldwide, claimed 370 of those North American attacks on its own — nearly 19% of the regional total. Akira followed with 268, and INC Ransom added another 164. Together, Qilin and Akira alone accounted for more than half of all recorded ransomware activity across the region, a level of concentration that points to a small number of highly organized affiliate networks doing the bulk of the damage rather than a diffuse swarm of opportunists.

Also read: Qilin Ransomware Group’s TTPs Examined by Researchers

Where the Pressure Lands

Professional Services bore the brunt of North American ransomware activity, with INC Ransom showing a marked preference for law firms and other high-value services with sensitive client data. Construction, Manufacturing and Healthcare followed close behind.

One operator, AiLock, stood out for a coordinated wave of victim disclosures that all landed on the same day — March 3 — a pattern consistent with a mass-exploitation campaign rather than isolated intrusions. LockBit, despite years of law enforcement pressure and takedown attempts, kept up a steady tempo against public-sector and educational targets throughout the period, showcasing how difficult the group has been to fully dismantle.

On the data breach side, Technology and financial services (BFSI) were the most frequently targeted sectors in North America, together accounting for roughly 43% of incidents — a reflection of how much intellectual property and monetizable personal data those industries hold.

Notably, Agriculture & Livestock emerged as a significant target for initial access brokers, accounting for a third of all access listings tied to the region. Cyble flags this as a sign of "growing risk in the food supply chain," an area that has historically drawn less attention from ransomware operators than finance or healthcare.

The initial access market itself was strikingly concentrated: two sellers, tracked under the handles "redpin" and "xpl0itrs," accounted for nearly all listings targeting North American organizations. Threat actors also continued to lean on known and zero-day vulnerabilities in widely deployed enterprise platforms — including products from Ivanti and Palo Alto Networks — as their preferred way into corporate networks.

Hacktivism Blurs into Cybercrime

North America wasn't spared the hacktivism wave sweeping the rest of the world either. Collectives including SOLDADOS DIGITALES – UNIÓN AMERICANA and LYSTIC TEAM #ID drove roughly 56 data leak or dump posts and touched about 360 unique domains across the region, with Government, Technology, financial services and telecommunications entities most frequently in the crosshairs.

Cyble's broader findings suggest many groups marketing themselves as ideologically driven hacktivists are, in practice, running side businesses in stolen data brokerage and DDoS-for-hire services — a blurring of motive that complicates how defenders triage the threat.

The scale of the U.S. numbers doesn't necessarily mean American companies have weaker defenses than their global peers — the concentration also reflects the sheer size and digital density of the U.S. economy, and its outsized share of the high-value targets ransomware affiliates chase. But the data does argue for a shift in posture.

Cyble's broader recommendations — treating data exfiltration, not just encryption, as the primary risk; prioritizing patches for the recurring vendor list; and monitoring initial access markets as a leading indicator rather than an afterthought — apply nowhere more urgently than in a country absorbing this much of the world's ransomware volume on its own.

A vishing call to an overseas contact center agent. A fake IT ticket. A default setting nobody thought to lock down. That's all it took to expose the personal data of roughly 5 million Australians — and now the country's privacy regulator has decided Qantas isn't to blame for it.

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) closed the book this week on its year-long preliminary inquiry into the June 2025 Qantas data breach, and the conclusion cuts against the instinct to punish the victim of a cyberattack.

Also read: Australia’s Qantas Confirms Cyberattack: 6 Million Service Records Compromised

According to the OAIC's report, the evidence gathered did not indicate a likelihood that Qantas had "failed" to take reasonable steps to protect the personal information it held, nor that it failed to ensure its overseas third-party provider complied with Australia's privacy principles. No investigation. No enforcement action.

"After more than a year of making inquiries and obtaining information on the data breach, we're satisfied that the evidence does not support the likelihood that a breach of privacy law occurred. As a result, we've decided not to commence a full investigation of Qantas at this stage." - Carly Kind, Australian Privacy Commissioner.

How It Happened

The breach traces back to a single phone call. A threat actor posing as "Qantas IT help" convinced a contact center agent to visit a website tied to the customer relationship management platform used by Qantas agents, walking them through steps framed as necessary to close an IT support ticket. That interaction connected the agent's CRM session to a data extraction tool controlled by the attacker, who then pulled data from every contact profile the agent could access. It was pure social engineering — no malware, no exploited vulnerability, just a convincing lie.

Qantas caught it fast. A staff member spotted an unusual spike in login-attempt alerts on the morning of June 30, two days after the call, and escalated it to the cybersecurity team. Within hours, the company had frozen the compromised account, assessed for data exfiltration, and triggered its incident response process. Public disclosure followed on July 2.

What Was Exposed — And What Wasn't

The regulator's numbers are more precise than what circulated publicly last year. Roughly 5.67 million customer records were compromised, with about 4 million exposing names, phone numbers, email addresses and Frequent Flyer details, and a further 1.7 million records including combinations of home or business addresses, dates of birth, gender and meal preferences. Critically, no credit card numbers, financial information or passport details lived on the compromised platform, and customer passwords and login credentials were never touched.

Also read: Qantas Airways Cyberattack Update: Customer Data Released, Security Measures Enhanced

Why The Regulator Let It Go

The OAIC's reasoning is a rare, explicit acknowledgment that good controls don't guarantee immunity. Investigators found that social engineering training generally targets credential theft, not the rarer tactic of talking an employee into authorizing a legitimate-looking system connection — meaning the attack likely would have succeeded even with standard training in place. They also noted the flaw was structural: a default configuration let the agent authorize a third-party app connection, a setting the CRM vendor has since changed for all its customers.

Commissioner Carly Kind put the broader stakes plainly in the OAIC's statement announcing the report, warning that AI-driven threats are only raising the bar. As she framed it, agentic and advanced AI will keep escalating the cybersecurity risks businesses face, making continuous review of security posture non-negotiable — not optional.

“Data breaches are a persistent feature of today’s digital world, and can occur despite organisations taking steps to protect personal information,” Commissioner Carly said. “Agentic and advanced AI will only increase the cybersecurity risks that businesses face, and it is critical that all organisations continuously review and enhance their security to protect against this growing threat.”

The takeaway here isn't that Qantas got a pass. It's that a regulator has now drawn, in writing, the line between negligence and the limits of what training and access controls can realistically stop.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has identified AI Cyber Attacks as the biggest near-term cybersecurity threat facing the Indian banking system, according to the June 2026 edition of its Financial Stability Report (FSR). The central bank's latest assessment highlights that while banks and financial institutions have strengthened cyber risk management practices, rapid advances in artificial intelligence are making cyber threats more difficult to counter. The findings are based on a survey conducted by the RBI to assess the preparedness of major banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) against evolving cyber risks. The survey found that institutions have established robust cybersecurity practices, particularly in vulnerability assessment and penetration testing of critical systems. However, AI Cyber Attacks emerged as the most significant challenge expected over the next 12 months.

AI Cyber Attacks Lead RBI's Cyber Risk Assessment

According to the RBI Financial Stability Report, AI-enabled cyber threats can increase the speed, scale and sophistication of attacks targeting financial infrastructure. Survey responses showed that most financial institutions are still in the developing or intermediate stages of integrating AI-specific threat preparedness into their existing cybersecurity frameworks, while only a smaller number reported mature capabilities. The report states that continued improvements in threat monitoring, detection, response mechanisms, employee awareness and cyber resilience will remain critical as AI-powered attacks continue to evolve.

Cybersecurity Practices Improve, But Gaps Remain

The RBI noted that financial institutions have made significant progress in cyber risk management. Regulatory reporting processes and board-level reporting of major cyber incidents have also matured. However, the report identified employee cybersecurity awareness and training as areas requiring further improvement, noting that human behaviour remains one of the most exploited entry points for cyberattacks. It also highlighted the need to strengthen forensic preparedness to improve incident response, preserve digital evidence and support regulatory and law enforcement investigations following sophisticated cyber incidents. The survey further revealed that around 67 percent of respondents increased IT and cybersecurity staffing between March 2025 and March 2026. Additionally, 71 percent reported higher cybersecurity spending as a share of overall IT expenditure during the last three financial years.

Third-Party Risk Emerges as Second Biggest Concern

Beyond AI Cyber Attacks, the RBI ranked third-party risk and supply chain dependencies as the second most important cybersecurity challenge for the financial sector. The survey found that 93 percent of respondents rely partially or substantially on external vendors for cybersecurity functions such as security operations centre monitoring, cloud security, incident response, threat intelligence and vulnerability assessments. Three-fourths of respondents also reported moderate to very high dependence on third-party technology providers for critical applications. According to the RBI, a major cyber incident affecting a common service provider could rapidly disrupt multiple regulated entities and create broader financial stability risks.

Growing Digital Transactions Increase Cyber Risk

The report noted that cyber risk has become a major financial stability concern as India's financial ecosystem becomes increasingly digital and interconnected. About 79 percent of surveyed institutions said more than three-fourths of their customer transactions are now conducted through digital financial services. Although 98 percent of respondents rated their current cyber risk exposure as very low to moderate and reported minimal disruption to customer services during 2025-26, nearly one-third indicated that cyber risk had increased compared with the previous year. The RBI also observed that geopolitical uncertainty is contributing to the evolving threat landscape, with 42 percent of surveyed institutions believing it has increased the likelihood of cyberattacks.

Financial Sector Cybersecurity Strategy Advances

The report said the proposed Financial Sector Cybersecurity Strategy is at an advanced stage of formulation. Developed by an Inter-Ministerial Group under the Financial Stability and Development Council, the strategy aims to establish governance frameworks, regulatory harmonisation and implementation timelines across the financial sector. The RBI said the strategy will address cybersecurity risks associated with artificial intelligence, cloud computing, quantum technologies, third-party dependencies, consumer protection and cross-sector critical infrastructure, strengthening the resilience of India's financial system against emerging cyber threats.

Cyber threats across the Middle East, Turkey, and Africa (META) continued to intensify in the first quarter of 2026, with ransomware groups, hacktivist campaigns, and large-scale data breaches shaping a volatile threat landscape for organizations across the region. According to Cyble’s latest META Threat Landscape Report, ransomware remained one of the most disruptive threats during Q1 2026, with attacks targeting industries ranging from government and construction to banking and energy. The findings also point to a growing overlap between financially motivated cybercrime and geopolitically driven cyber activity.

Ransomware Attacks Continue to Rise

Researchers observed 116 ransomware incidents publicly disclosed across the META region during the first three months of 2026. Turkey recorded the highest number of attacks, followed by the UAE, while countries including South Africa and Egypt also faced significant ransomware activity. Among the most active threat groups was Gentlemen, which accounted for a notable share of observed attacks during the quarter. Other ransomware operators including INC Ransom, Qilin, Tengu, and LockBit also remained highly active. Construction emerged as the most targeted industry, followed closely by government agencies, law enforcement organizations, financial services, and energy companies. These sectors often manage sensitive operations and critical infrastructure, making them attractive targets for cybercriminals seeking maximum disruption and financial leverage. The Cyble report also highlights how ransomware operations are becoming increasingly organized, with many groups continuing to operate under ransomware-as-a-service models that allow affiliates to scale attacks rapidly.

Data Breaches Expose Sensitive Information

Beyond ransomware, underground forums remained flooded with stolen databases and claims of unauthorized access linked to organizations across the region. Threat actors allegedly offered access to sensitive data connected to sectors such as hospitality, healthcare, sports, influencer marketing, and energy. In one case, a threat actor claimed to possess terabytes of information linked to Qatar’s energy sector, including credentials and cloud backups. Government and public sector organizations also remained frequent targets, reflecting growing concerns around espionage, politically motivated operations, and long-term intelligence gathering.

Vulnerability Exploitation Driving Intrusions

The report notes that attackers continue to move quickly after new vulnerabilities become public. Several high-severity flaws disclosed during the quarter were rapidly added to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, reinforcing how threat actors are actively monitoring enterprise technologies for exploitable weaknesses. Enterprise management systems, security tools, and internet-facing applications remained among the most targeted technologies. One of the more notable cases involved a critical Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile vulnerability that could allow unauthenticated remote code execution. Researchers say such flaws continue to attract threat actors because they provide a pathway into enterprise environments without requiring stolen credentials.

META Threat Landscape Report Highlights Geopolitical Tensions

Hacktivist activity also remained elevated throughout Q1 2026. Researchers tracked hundreds of posts related to data leaks, website defacements, and distributed denial-of-service attacks affecting thousands of domains across the META region. Much of this activity appeared linked to ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly conflicts involving Israel, Iran, and neighboring regions. Threat actors increasingly used cyber operations not just for disruption, but also to amplify political messaging and influence public narratives online. The report suggests that organizations operating in politically sensitive regions may continue to face elevated cyber risks throughout the year.

A Growing Need for Proactive Cyber Defense

The findings from Q1 2026 reflect a broader shift in the threat landscape, where cyberattacks are becoming faster, more coordinated, and more difficult to contain. For organizations across the META region, visibility into emerging threats, exposed assets, ransomware activity, and vulnerability exploitation is becoming increasingly important as attackers continue to evolve their tactics. The full META Threat Landscape Report offers a closer look at the threat groups, industries, and attack trends shaping the region’s cybersecurity environment in early 2026. Readers interested in ransomware trends, regional targeting patterns, and emerging cyber risks can explore the Cyble report for deeper insights into how the threat landscape is evolving.

The IOCTA 2026 report released by Europol offers a detailed look at how cybercrime is evolving across Europe, with criminals increasingly using artificial intelligence, encryption, and cryptocurrencies to scale their operations. The latest edition of the Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment outlines key trends shaping the threat landscape and calls for stronger coordination among law enforcement agencies. According to the IOCTA 2026 report, cybercrime is becoming more complex and interconnected, driven by rapid technological advancements. The findings highlight how criminals are adapting quickly, making it harder for authorities to detect, track, and disrupt their activities.

IOCTA 2026 Report Maps Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape

The IOCTA 2026 report serves as a roadmap for understanding emerging cyber threats, covering areas such as online fraud, ransomware attacks, and child exploitation networks. Edvardas Šileris, Head of the European Cybercrime Centre at Europol, emphasized that the report is intended to help law enforcement agencies respond effectively to these evolving risks. He noted that as cybercriminals continue to exploit new technologies, strengthening capabilities and improving collaboration will be essential to protect citizens and critical infrastructure.

Dark Web Fragmentation and Cryptocurrencies Fuel Crime

A key finding in the IOCTA 2026 report is the continued role of the dark web as a central hub for cybercriminal activity. Despite ongoing crackdowns, marketplaces and forums remain active, with criminals frequently shifting platforms to avoid detection. The report highlights how fragmentation and specialization across these platforms make investigations more difficult. Encrypted messaging services and anonymized networks are increasingly connecting surface and dark web environments, reducing the visibility of criminal operations. Cryptocurrencies also play a significant role, according to the IOCTA 2026 report. Privacy-focused coins and offshore exchanges are widely used to launder ransomware payments, making financial tracking more challenging. The report also points to a growing trend of younger individuals becoming involved in cryptocurrency-related activities, sometimes without understanding the legal risks.

AI-Driven Fraud Expands Across Europe

The IOCTA 2026 report identifies artificial intelligence as a major driver of online fraud. Cybercriminals are using generative AI tools to create highly targeted phishing campaigns and social engineering attacks. These tools allow attackers to:

• Personalize fraudulent messages at scale
• Mimic legitimate communication styles
• Automate large-scale scam operations

The report also highlights the use of caller ID spoofing and SIM farms, which enable attackers to send thousands of messages or calls simultaneously. This combination of AI and automation is increasing both the reach and success rate of fraud campaigns.

Ransomware and Data Extortion Remain Key Threats

Ransomware continues to be a dominant threat, as outlined in the IOCTA 2026 report. A large number of active ransomware groups were observed throughout 2025, with many adopting data extortion tactics. Instead of relying solely on encryption, attackers are increasingly threatening to release stolen data to pressure victims into paying. This shift has made cyberattacks more damaging, particularly for public institutions and large organizations. The report also notes growing links between state-sponsored actors and criminal groups, with some cybercriminals acting as proxies in broader geopolitical strategies. Emerging hacking coalitions are adding another layer of complexity to the threat landscape.

Rise in Online Child Exploitation and Criminal Networks

The IOCTA 2026 report highlights a concerning increase in online child sexual exploitation cases. The financial trade of child abuse material is growing, and the use of synthetic content is creating new challenges for investigators. Encrypted messaging platforms are widely used by offenders, making it harder for authorities to monitor and intervene. The report also points to the emergence of organized online communities that engage in multiple forms of criminal activity. These networks combine cybercrime with violent offenses, creating a complex and dangerous ecosystem that extends beyond digital spaces.

Need for Stronger Law Enforcement Collaboration

The findings of the IOCTA 2026 report reinforce the need for improved coordination between governments, law enforcement agencies, and industry stakeholders. As cyber threats become more advanced, isolated efforts are no longer sufficient. The report provides actionable insights and recommendations aimed at strengthening investigative capabilities and improving response strategies. It also stresses the importance of innovation in tackling new forms of cybercrime.