❌

Visualização de leitura

U.S. CISA adds SonicWall SonicOS SSLVPN flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

U.S. CISA adds SonicWall SonicOS SSLVPN vulnerability CVE-2026-19868 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added a SonicWall SonicOS SSLVPN flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-19868 (CVSS score of 7.5), to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

CVE-2026-19868 is an authentication bypass vulnerability affecting the SSL VPN service in SonicWall SonicOS.

“An authentication enforcement vulnerability in SonicOS SSLVPN service may allow a user with valid credentials for an alternate authentication method to bypass SAML authentication controls. Successful exploitation may also bypass SAML-enforced multi-factor authentication (MFA).” reads the advisory.

The flaw occurs when the system does not properly enforce SAML authentication controls. An attacker who already has valid credentials for an alternative authentication method may exploit this weakness to bypass SAML-based authentication.

The impact is particularly serious when organisations rely on SAML to enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA). Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to access the SSL VPN without completing the expected SAML authentication process, potentially bypassing the additional MFA protection.

In practical terms, the vulnerability could weaken an organisation’s remote access security by allowing users with alternative valid credentials to circumvent its intended authentication controls.

It’s important to highlight that this is not an unauthenticated remote access vulnerability. The attacker needs valid credentials for an alternative authentication method, but may then bypass SAML-enforced security controls.

SonicWall’s PSIRT team is investigating a report of possible exploitation of this flaw. The company strongly recommends that customers install the latest available update as soon as possible to reduce the risk of attacks.

“SonicWall PSIRT has investigated a report indicating potential exploitation of this vulnerability. Customers are strongly urged to upgrade to the latest release as soon as possible to mitigate the associated risks.” reads the advisory.

According to Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, FCEB agencies have to address the identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect their networks against attacks exploiting the flaws in the catalog.

Experts also recommend that private organizations review the Catalog and address the vulnerabilities in their infrastructure.

CISA orders federal agencies to fix the flaw by November 20, 2026.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, CISA)

SonicWall Patches CVSS 10.0 SSRF Flaw as Attacks Begin

Attackers are exploiting SonicWall SMA 1000 vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-102255 (CVSS score of 10.0), just days after its public disclosure.

Attackers have begun exploiting a critical flaw in SonicWall SMA 1000 appliances, tracked as CVE-2026-102255 (CVSS score of 10.0), just days after public disclosure. The vulnerability is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw that requires no login. Attackers could abuse it to make the appliance send requests and access internal functions, allowing unauthorized actions.

“A Pre-authentication SSRF vulnerability exists in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface due to an unintended alternate access path.” reads the advisory. “By abusing this path, a remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to direct the appliance to issue requests on their behalf and reach internal functionality and perform unauthorized operations.”

The vendor said it has found no evidence of exploitation, but recommends applying the fixes.

The vulnerability affects the following product and versions:

Affected ProductAffected Version(s)
SMA1000 Models – 6210, 7210, 8200v 12.4.3-03526 (platform-hotfix) and older versions. 12.5.0-02952 (platform-hotfix) and older versions. 

The company pointed out that the flaws do not impact SSL-VPN running on SonicWall firewalls or the SMA 100 Series product line.

The hotfix is available through the MySonicWall portal, the vendor pointed out that there is no workaround.

Multiple researchers warn the vulnerability is now being actively exploited. Cybersecurity firm Defused has detected unauthenticated SSRF traffic targeting its SonicWall SMA decoys since October 8, 2026. Defused alerted subscribers through its Radar service.

🚨Since yesterday we have been observing unauthenticated SSRF traffic against our SonicWall SMA decoys. CVE-2026-102255 (alternate access path SSRF, CVSS 10.0) was disclosed earlier this week by SonicWall. We notified Defused subscribers of the anomalous traffic via our Radar… pic.twitter.com/h0w30YT0Y3

— Defused (@DefusedCyber) October 9, 2026


Cybersecurity firm Previdian also announced that its sensors have detected exploitation attempts targeting SonicWall SMA 1000 appliances, consistent with CVE-2026-102255. The reported attacker IP is 146.70.143[.]142.

🚨 SonicWall SMA1000 exploitation attempts are now being observed by Previdian sensors, consistent with CVE-2026-102255 (CVSS 10.0).

The vulnerability allows unauthenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF).

Attacker IP: 146.70.143[.]142

Apply SonicWall's hotfix and… pic.twitter.com/YBovnuEkvD

— Previdian (@PrevidianCyber) October 9, 2026


According to Previdian, researchers have recorded 135 attack attempts from two IP addresses in the United States. Researchers have recorded 135 attempts from two different IP addresses in the United States. SonicWall has not yet updated its security advisory to confirm that attackers are exploiting the flaw.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, SonicWall)

SonicWall Fixes Max Severity Pre-Auth Flaw in SMA1000 Appliances

SonicWall patched a CVSS 10 pre-auth SSRF flaw in SMA1000 appliances that could let unauthenticated attackers reach internal functions.

SonicWall released hotfixes for four vulnerabilities in its SMA1000 remote access appliances, including a critical flaw tracked as CVE-2026-102255 (CVSS score of 10.0. The issue is a pre-authentication SSRF bug in the WorkPlace portal that could let an unauthenticated attacker reach internal functions and perform unauthorized operations.

“A Pre-authentication SSRF vulnerability exists in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface due to an unintended alternate access path.” reads the advisory. “By abusing this path, a remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to direct the appliance to issue requests on their behalf and reach internal functionality and perform unauthorized operations.”

The vendor said it has found no evidence of exploitation, but recommends applying the fixes.

The vulnerability affects the following product and versions:

Affected ProductAffected Version(s)
SMA1000 Models – 6210, 7210, 8200v 12.4.3-03526 (platform-hotfix) and older versions. 12.5.0-02952 (platform-hotfix) and older versions. 

The company pointed out that the flaws do not impact SSL-VPN running on SonicWall firewalls or the SMA 100 Series product line.

The hotfix is available through the MySonicWall portal, the vendor pointed out that there is no workaround.

The other three flaws all require authentication. CVE-2026-102256, rated CVSS 7.8, is an OS command injection flaw that could allow an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary commands on the appliance. CVE-2026-102257, rated 7.2, is a Zip Slip vulnerability in the Appliance Management Console that could let an administrator extract files outside the intended directory and achieve remote code execution. CVE-2026-102258, rated 5.5, is a stored XSS flaw that could allow an authenticated administrator to store and execute malicious JavaScript in the management console.

In early September, SonicWall patched two zero-days (CVE-2026-83548 (CVSS 10.0) and CVE-2026-83549 (CVSS 7.8)) in SMA 1000 VPNs, including a CVSS 10 pre-auth SSRF flaw, after confirming active exploitation. SonicWall confirmed that the two SMA 1000 flaws are being exploited in the wild, with attackers likely chaining them to achieve arbitrary code execution.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, SonicWall)

UK Council Attack Linked to Mass Exploitation of SonicWall Flaw

A critical SonicWall flaw was rapidly weaponized, with a UK Council attack linked to a campaign that exposed credentials and enabled Active Directory theft.

On July 17, 2026, the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk announced it had detected a cyberattack affecting council services. Hunt.io has since published a detailed technical analysis linking that incident, with moderate confidence, to a wider mass-exploitation campaign against SonicWall SMA1000 appliances using CVE-2026-15409, a maximum-severity SSRF flaw that received a CVSS score of 10.0.

CVE-2026-15409 affects the WorkPlace portal’s WebSocket proxy. An attacker does not need to log in. By sending a specially crafted request to /wsproxy, they can make the appliance connect to port 1050 on its own local system, where a CouchDB-related Erlang service is running.

The attacker can then use a hardcoded cookie found in the appliance firmware to complete the Erlang connection and access the couchdb@127.0.0.1 node. From there, they can send commands that execute operating system commands with the privileges of the couchdb account.

The attack may sound complicated, but once automated, an attacker can complete all the steps in just a few seconds.

“Across the wider campaign, compromised appliances were used as footholds into internal networks. The operator deployed a standalone Linux build of Impacket’s secretsdump directly onto selected SonicWall appliances, enabling remote credential theft from internal Windows systems.” reads the report published by Hunt.io. “This approach could help the actor evade detection, as organisations typically have substantially less visibility into the underlying operating systems of firewall and VPN appliances than into managed Windows and Linux hosts monitored by EDR.”

Rapid7 researchers published a proof-of-concept on July 15. The operator had adapted it into a 50-thread mass scanner by July 16. Rapid7’s own Managed Detection and Response team had already observed active exploitation of the vulnerability before SonicWall’s July 14 advisory, meaning the gap between zero-day exploitation and mass-scale automated campaigns was effectively less than three days.

Hunt.io’s AttackCapture system crawled the attacker’s open directory at 95.181.173[.]36 on July 17, the same day the council announced its incident. That directory contained the operator’s complete toolchain: scan scripts, exploit code, credential-parsing utilities, a standalone Impacket binary, and the output files from the ongoing campaign.

The campaign data covered 250 target appliances. Of those, 168 exposed LDAP configuration files containing credentials for 534 Active Directory accounts across 160 domain names and 255 internal LDAP server addresses. Nine of those environments lost SAM and LSA secrets to the operator. Five lost their entire Active Directory database through full DCSync replication, targeting seven domain controllers in total.

After gaining access, the attackers follow a clear process. Their ldap_extract.py script reads /usr/local/extranet/etc/policy_file.xml from each compromised appliance and decrypts the LDAP passwords stored in the file.

The decryption uses a fixed 32-byte AES key embedded in the ASAPPasswordUtil.class code. This means the same key can work on every SonicWall SMA1000 device running vulnerable firmware.

Once they obtain valid LDAP credentials, the attackers download a standalone Linux version of Impacket’s secretsdump to /tmp/secretsdump from their server using curl. They then use the SonicWall appliance’s network access to run the tool against internal Windows systems and extract credentials and other sensitive information.

A SonicWall VPN appliance running secretsdump against internal domain controllers doesn’t trigger EDR alerts on Windows endpoints, doesn’t appear in Windows event logs as a rogue process, and doesn’t show up in most SIEM rules tuned for managed hosts. The appliance is doing exactly what it’s supposed to do: connecting to internal systems. The malicious traffic blends into legitimate network behaviour.

When the LDAP credentials did not have enough privileges to perform DCSync, the attackers used LSA secrets recovered with secretsdump. These secrets can contain the NTLM hash of a domain controller’s machine account. Because domain controllers normally have directory replication rights, the attackers could use these hashes to perform DCSync.

Their scripts searched the secretsdump output for account names ending in $, extracted the related hashes, and used them to launch pass-the-hash DCSync requests through the compromised SonicWall appliance.

The technique worked in five environments. The attackers used the SonicWall appliance to create NTDS database files in /tmp and then retrieved them by exploiting CVE-2026-15409 to execute commands on the device.

“The appliances associated with confirmed SAM and LSA theft were distributed across infrastructure in France, India, Italy and the United States.” Hunt.io states. “The wider target inventory was considerably broader, containing named gateways associated with organisations in the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Sweden, Poland, Hungary, South Korea and Hong Kong, among other locations.”

The sectors covered included local government and law enforcement, healthcare, financial services, universities, manufacturing, and managed IT providers. The targeting was opportunistic: the operator selected organizations because they ran a vulnerable SonicWall appliance, not because of what sector they were in. That’s consistent with the Shodan-derived target lists recovered from the directory, which contained nearly 200,000 addresses labelled as SonicWall systems.

The scripts contained extensive Chinese-language comments, but Hunt.io assessed this as insufficient for attribution. CISA added CVE-2026-15409 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog and noted it had been used in ransomware campaigns. A separate threat actor tracked as UTA0533 used the same vulnerability to deploy KNUCKLEBALL malware, and the ransomware group INC has also exploited the vulnerability chain. Multiple actors using the same CVSS-10 flaw in parallel is now the normal pattern for critical VPN and access device vulnerabilities, not an anomaly.

For SonicWall SMA1000 operators who haven’t patched: the fixed firmware versions are 12.4.3-03453 and later. Patching alone isn’t sufficient if exploitation has already occurred. SonicWall recommends re-imaging affected appliances, rotating all user and administrator credentials, and resetting TOTP tokens. The Hunt.io report includes specific log locations and indicators of compromise for assessments. The SHA-256 of the Impacket binary the operator used is 690f5031deede7d3357d0ca24c89866ae8c60e6c63b3a2c8bba813a6ac10ae5b, and the delivery IP was 95.181.173[.]36.

The operator ran their entire post-exploitation framework from an open HTTP server on port 80 without authentication. The exploitation was technically capable. The operational security was not. Hunt.io captured the whole operation while it was still running.

“The retained evidence shows how quickly public vulnerability research can be operationalised. By 16 July 2026, two days after SonicWall disclosed CVE-2026-15409, a threat actor was using modified, multithreaded tooling to identify vulnerable SMA 1000 appliances, extract and decrypt LDAP credentials, and automate follow-on credential theft against internal Active Directory environments.” concludes the report. “Deploying a standalone Linux build of Impacket directly to compromised edge appliances made the operation both scalable and evasive. Most organisations have substantially less process, file and network visibility into the underlying operating systems of security appliances than they have through EDR on managed Windows and Linux hosts. This visibility gap allowed the SonicWall appliances to function as internal attack platforms from which the operator collected SAM and LSA secrets and, in five AD domains, performed full DCSync replication.”

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, SonicWall)

Ransomware Tool Matrix Project Updates: Three Groups To Track

 


Introduction


This blog is a focused update on the latest updates to the Ransomware Tool Matrix (RTM) and the Ransomware Vulnerability Matrix (RVM) covering three groups that I have published profiles for to help defenders home in on the threats most relevant to them: TheGentlemen, DragonForce, and WarLock.


Rather than write another broad ecosystem summary, the goal of this post is to introduce these profiles, briefly explain why each group matters right now, and give readers direct links to them so defenders can pivot straight into hunting, detection engineering, and patch prioritisation.


For anyone new to the projects, please read the descriptions on GitHub or feel free to watch my talk explaining the project at BSides London.


Why these three groups?


Each of the three groups added in this update represents a different slice of the current ransomware ecosystem:


TheGentlemen


TheGentlemen is a newer operation that has matured quickly, with a large and varied toolkit that reflects how cross-pollinated the affiliate ecosystem has become. The recent internal chat leak gave researchers a rare look into their tradecraft, and the profiles capture both the tooling and the exploited CVEs that have been observed across multiple intrusions. TheGentlemen’s RTM profile is here and RVM profile is here.


DragonForce


DragonForce has continued to escalate throughout 2025 and into 2026, branching into MSP-focused attacks and standing up its own "cartel" model that other affiliates can plug into. Its exploitation of edge devices (Ivanti, Fortinet, SonicWall) and SimpleHelp RMM make it a high-priority threat for any organisation using such systems. DragonForce’s RTM profile is here and RVM profile is here.


WarLock


WarLock jumped onto everyone's radar after the ToolShell SharePoint zero-day exploitation campaign, and has since been linked to a string of edge-application exploits including SmarterMail, SolarWinds Web Help Desk, and Gladinet CentreStack. It is a strong example of a likely China-based operator that lives on zero-day exploitation of internet-facing software. WarLock’s RTM profile is here and RVM profile is here.


Observations and Trends


A few themes are worth flagging across all three profiles:


  • BYOVD is now standard, not novel. All three groups have been observed bringing vulnerable drivers to disable or blind EDR. TheGentlemen with ThrottleStop driver, DragonForce with the TrueSight and Hangzhou Shunwang drivers, and WarLock with Antiy, NsecSoft, Rising, and VMTools drivers. If your detection stack is not yet hunting on or blocking suspicious driver loads and known-bad driver hashes, that is a high-priority gap to close.
  • Network edge devices and other internet-facing systems remain the front door to victim networks for these groups. Fortinet, Ivanti, SonicWall, SimpleHelp, Microsoft SharePoint, SmarterMail, SolarWinds Web Help Desk, and Gladinet CentreStack all appear across these three profiles. Patch prioritisation that focuses on internet-exposed appliances and admin tooling continues to give defenders a valuable return on effort.
  • Legitimate tooling continues to blur the line. Velociraptor, Cloudflared, VSCode Tunnels, AnyDesk, MeshCentral, FreeRDP, PuTTY, OpenSSH, and a long list of legitimate cloud services are all being repurposed for ransomware operations. Defender should use these lists to begin baselining what should exist in their environment and start alerting on the rest.

Conclusion


My recommendation for defenders remains the same as in previous updates: take the tools and CVEs from the RTM and RVM profiles and start threat hunting for their presence, writing detection rules to alert on certain behaviours, and blocking what is not expected or permitted in your environment. These three new profiles should make that easier to scope by group when you need to brief leadership, prioritise a hunt, or map your exposure to a specific campaign.


Here's a few sites that can help with turning the threat intel in these new profiles into detections:


- https://rulehound.com/rules

- https://detection.fyi

- https://www.snapattack.com/community


As always, feedback and pull requests are very welcome on both repos. Thanks to everyone who has contributed reports, corrections, and ideas. These projects only stay useful because the community keeps feeding them one way or another.

CVEs Targeting Remote Access Technologies in 2025

The exploitation of vulnerabilities targeting remote access technologies to gain initial access is continuing relentlessly also during 2025, with initial access brokers, and in general opportunistic and targeted threat actors, quite active in leveraging software flaws to break into organizations.
❌