No travel, no lessons, no test, and a UAE licence at the end of it. That was the promise behind a fake driving licence scheme that Dubai Police say has now been shut down. An eight-member criminal gang has been arrested for fraudulently obtaining driving licences from a neighbouring country for customers who had never been there, then helping them swap those licences for a UAE driving licence.

The gang charged AED 10,000 per licence. The arrests were made by Dubai Police’s General Department of Criminal Investigation, in cooperation with the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Dubai’s Roads and Transport Authority (RTA).

How the Fake Driving Licence Scheme Worked

Dubai Police’s Economic Crimes Department found that the gang exploited legitimate licence exchange agreements. These arrangements allow holders of driving licences issued by certain countries to exchange them for UAE licences without additional training or testing, provided they meet the necessary requirements.

The suspects used offices belonging to transaction processing companies in the UAE to approach potential customers and promote their services. They offered to arrange licences from a neighbouring country without customers needing to travel there, learn to drive or pass mandatory tests.

Once obtained, the licences could be presented for exchange through Dubai’s RTA. In effect, the scheme used an agreement designed to simplify the process for eligible drivers to bypass the training and testing meant to confirm that drivers are qualified.

Why Police Call It a Risk to Road Safety

Dubai Police warned that obtaining a licence through illegal means is more than a procedural violation. It can pose a serious threat to road safety.

Driving lessons and examinations assess whether motorists have the skills, knowledge and ability to handle different traffic situations. Skipping them could put unqualified drivers on public roads, endangering motorists, passengers, pedestrians and other road users.

The force urged residents to be cautious of individuals or businesses promising licences without the required training, testing or legal procedures.

Fake Driving Licence Buyers Could Face Legal Action

Police stressed that legal responsibility does not stop with those arranging the licences. Anyone who knowingly pays for a fake driving licence obtained through unlawful procedures may also face penalties and legal action.

Dubai Police also clarified a key point for buyers. Exchanging an illegally obtained foreign licence for a UAE licence does not make the original licence legitimate, and it does not exempt the holder from responsibility. Completing the official exchange process cannot be used to justify violations committed when the foreign licence was obtained.

What the Exchange Agreements Actually Allow

According to Dubai Police, international licence exchange agreements exist to make it easier to exchange legally issued licences that meet the relevant requirements. They do not allow applicants to bypass the rules that govern how licences are originally issued in their home countries.

The force urged anyone seeking a driving licence to follow approved procedures and deal only with authorised entities. Residents were also encouraged to report individuals or companies offering licences through unlawful means, to help authorities identify fraud and protect the community.

Dubai Police reaffirmed that properly trained and qualified drivers are fundamental to road safety, and that licence exchange arrangements must never be used to get around these requirements.

site-verification-ok

What Happened

Four notable UK prosecutions illustrate the growing intersection of cybercrime, online exploitation subcultures, and digital terrorism involving teenage offenders:

Scattered Spider Operators Sentenced for Transport for London (TfL) Hack:

• In July 2026, Thalha Jubair (20) and Owen Flowers (18) were sentenced at Woolwich Crown Court to five years and six months each in prison. Convicted under Section 3ZA of the Computer Misuse Act (CMA), reserved for attacks causing serious damage to critical national infrastructure, the pair, operating as part of the "Scattered Spider" collective, breached Transport for London (TfL) in late August 2024.
• Initiated when Flowers was 17, the attack bypassed two-factor authentication (2FA) by social engineering a TfL help-desk worker over the phone. The intrusion knocked 148 internal IT systems offline, forced in-person password resets for 27,000 staff, exposed up to 10 million customer records, and incurred £29 million to £39 million in operational and recovery costs. 

"The Com" Online Exploitation Network: 

• In August 2026, Justin Swaddle (20) of Leeds was sentenced at Leeds Crown Court to two years' imprisonment, alongside a 10-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order, following a National Crime Agency (NCA) investigation.
• Swaddle, who began offending at age 17 under aliases such as "Epstein" and "Moscow" across Telegram, Discord, and Snapchat, operated within "The Com," a decentralised online network of youth engaged in cyber-extortion, harassment, and swatting.
• Swaddle used doxxing threats and intimate images to blackmail 117 female victims worldwide (aged 13–17) into self-harm and sexual abuse for peer recognition and status within the community.  

Cybersecurity Provisioning for Proscribed Terrorist Groups:

• In July 2026, Yusuf Shah (18) of Ilford was convicted at Kingston Crown Court of multiple offences under the Terrorism Act 2000 following an investigation by Counter Terrorism Policing (CTP) London.
• Radicalised online from age 13, Shah offered technical capabilities to proscribed groups via Telegram, authored a bespoke manual titled "A Guide on Cybersecurity" for Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), and facilitated an untraceable $1,376.51 cryptocurrency donation to Al-Qaeda using privacy techniques he developed.

There must have been red faces in the social media department of Ireland's police headquarters after two of its accounts were hijacked this week. Read more in my article on the Hot for Security blog.

What Happened

Four key UK enforcement actions have showcased the diversifying spectrum of cryptocurrency crime in the UK in 2026. This ranges from violent home invasions to sophisticated police impersonation and seed phrase social engineering. UK law enforcement also cracked down on P2P exchanges to help prevent cryptocurrency laundering and cashing out.

Cryptocurrency Theft via Physical Violence (February 2026)

• Three individuals from Sheffield executed a targeted home invasion in London. Posing as Amazon delivery drivers, the teenagers ambushed the victim with physical violence, forced him to transfer $4.5 million (£3.1 million) in cryptocurrency to their accounts, and stole his vehicle.
• The offenders recorded their escape and boasted about the crime on Snapchat. The Metropolitan Police tracked the vehicle down and detained all three suspects within hours of the crime taking place.
• The trio was sentenced at Sheffield Crown Court to a combined total of 16 years in youth detention, with the victim's assets recovered within 72 hours.

OCG Arrested for Seed Phrase Vishing (May 2026)

• Ten suspects were arrested and charged following a coordinated multi-force operation led by the Eastern Region Special Operations Unit (ERSOU) alongside the Met, City of London Police, Kent Police, and YHROCU.
• The organised crime group (OCG) targeted victims via fraudulent phone calls, posing as police officers or cryptocurrency platform representatives. Victims were tricked into disclosing critical wallet credentials, including private wallet seed phrases, allowing the attackers to drain the contents of their wallets.
• One victim alone lost over £300,000. Simultaneous search warrants across Kent, Essex, London, and Yorkshire resulted in ten individuals being charged with conspiracy to defraud.

Impersonation Gang Jailed Over £4 Million Police Impersonation Fraud (July 2026) 

• At Southwark Crown Court, three men in their twenties, were jailed for up to six years for defrauding eight victims out of over £4 million in cryptocurrency.
• The gang impersonated police officers over the phone, informing victims their assets were compromised and convincing them to move funds to "secure police accounts" or share account access. To reinforce the ruse, the group also constructed fake police websites.
• The Met Police Cryptocurrency Team dismantled the OCG, seizing 40 mobile devices, luxury vehicles, and recovering £1 million in direct victim funds.

FCA and Partners Crackdown on Illegal P2P Crypto Trading (September 2026):

• In a joint operation, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), and the Metropolitan Police targeted three London premises operating as unregistered peer-to-peer (P2P) cryptocurrency exchanges, serving cease-and-desist letters to halt their unauthorised commercial activities under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017.
• Because carrying out P2P crypto trading "by way of business" legally requires FCA authorisation, and zero P2P crypto businesses are currently registered in the UK, these firms operated outside mandatory Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) frameworks, establishing a critical, unregulated liquidity channel for criminals to move and launder illicit funds.

Analyst Comment

The operational shift in UK-based cryptocurrency targeting indicates a dangerous blend of high-tech social engineering and low-tech physical coercion.

The first case involving the home invasion highlights to risks of showing off rich lifestyles on social media. Unfortunately, we live in an age whereby criminals can research their targets and gather the information necessary to attack their homes. High net-work individuals are prime targets and can be relatively trivial to locate due to posting their lives on social media.

Both the cryptocurrency vishing cases highlight the effectiveness of police impersonation. Threat actors exploit the high trust and compliance associated with law enforcement branding to bypass technical two-factor authentication (2FA) mechanisms, inducing panic in victims to voluntarily surrender seed phrases or authorise wallet transfers.

In the UK, unlawful gains are rapidly off ramped into physical luxury items (designer clothing, jewellery, high-end vehicles) or moved to foreign jurisdictions. However, as demonstrated by the Snapchat post in the Sheffield home invasion case, cybercriminal operational security (OPSEC) remains a primary vulnerability for law enforcement to exploit.

Unregistered P2P cryptocurrency exchanges continue to operate as a liquidity channel where illicit virtual funds can be converted into physical cash or clean bank transfers. By targeting the physical infrastructure where shadow financial activity meets the mainstream economy, law enforcement can starve wider cybercrime ecosystems of accessible liquidity.

Defensive Takeaways

Security teams, high-net-worth individuals, and institutional custodians must update defence models to protect against hybrid physical/digital vectors:

• Operational Security (OPSEC) & Privacy: Minimise public disclosure of crypto holdings, wallet addresses, and physical locations. Threat actors frequently leverage social media OSINT to target victims for home invasions or vishing campaigns.
• Absolute Protection of Seed Phrases: Never disclose seed phrases, recovery keys, or private keys to anyone. Legitimate financial institutions, exchanges, and law enforcement agencies will never request seed phrases or ask users to transfer funds to a "safe account".
• Out-of-Band Verification: If contacted by someone claiming to be a police officer or exchange representative regarding asset security, hang up immediately. Independently verify the call by calling the official institution number.
• Multi-Signature (Multi-Sig) & Time-Locked Storage: Implement multi-sig wallets requiring authorisations across geographically separated keys, alongside time-locked vaults. This mitigates the immediate risk of forced transfers during physical home invasions.

Relevant Sources

1. https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/amazon-delivery-thief-londoncrytpcurrency-met-police-video-b2914193.html
2. https://x.com/metpoliceuk/status/2019078494227997095
3. https://www.rocu.police.uk/news/2026/may/ten-arrests-arrested-linked-to-alleged-crypto-currency-scam/
4. https://news.met.police.uk/news/men-who-stole-more-than-4-pounds-million-of-crypto-are-jailed-511271
5. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-and-partners-continues-crackdown-illegal-crypto-trading

404Media is reporting (alternate link) that a cyber-weapons arms manufacturer is exploiting a vulnerability in iOS to bypass its automatic reboot security feature. This is the feature that automatically puts an iPhone into a more secure state if it hasn’t been used for 72 hours.

The new technology to get around inactivity reboot was developed by Magnet Forensics, the company behind GrayKey, a popular tool sold to law enforcement agencies that allows them to unlock and access data stored in iPhones and Android smartphones. Magnet has developed a new device called GrayKey Preserve and a feature for its regular GrayKey devices called Evidence Preservation Mode, according to the video.

“This is an absolute game changer for iOS forensics and a function that I wish we had years ago,” a Magnet employee says in the leaked video, specifically mentioning that the solution is targeted at the iPhone’s inactivity reboot feature and the data it makes unavailable. GrayKey Preserve and Evidence Preservation Mode are also designed to combat another iPhone feature that automatically deletes certain data ­- such as cached locations, and recently deleted photos and iMessages ­- after a certain number of days. “We’re gonna be able to preserve that data for an infinite amount of time.”

Presumably, now that Apple engineers know that this flaw exists they can find and fix it. AI turns out to be really good at this sort of thing.

Another news article.

Dutch police say a ShinyHunters suspect is also suspected of trying to arrange two murders abroad, a case separate from the cybercrime investigation.

💾

Modern messaging apps allow users to link their phone accounts to their computer desktop. Eavesdroppers are taking advantage of this capability:

Apps such as WhatsApp Web and Signal Desktop allow people to use their accounts on other devices, such as laptops or desktop computers.

Germany’s Customs Office has been using these features to connect a police-controlled computer to a suspect’s account.

Once connected, messages can be delivered to that computer without the police having to crack the encryption protecting them.

Netzpoltik details that police are able to gain access in this way either through physical access to someone’s phone or by intercepting verification codes via a state-sanctioned phishing attack or intercepting SMS messages via telephone surveillance.

That last paragraph is important. Making this work requires user consent.

What we want is a feature that displays connected devices, so users could notice if a new device gets connected to their account.

Dutch police arrested convicted hacker Pepijn van der Stap in the ShinyHunters probe into the Odido breach, which exposed data belonging to millions of customers.

A store in Auckland vibe-coded itself a new website. Within hours, its inventory had somehow expanded to include a pair of crusty socks, an $850 banana, and all of New Zealand's national parks. What could possibly have gone wrong? Meanwhile, a hacker collective backed a truck into one of the license-plate-reading Flock safety cameras popping up on American street corners, and took a very close look inside. All this and more in episode 486 of the "Smashing Security" podcast with cybersecurity expert and keynote speaker Graham Cluley, and special guest Dave Bittner.

A 2017 UK assessment warned that police data on Microsoft Azure could face foreign access risks. The risks may still exist.

A Guardian investigation has surfaced a 2017 document signed off by then City of London police commissioner Ian Dyson, who also held the title of senior information risk owner for the entire country. That document reviewed 15 risks tied to moving police data onto Microsoft Azure. The files in question include criminal records, victim statements, internal emails, information from more than 40 UK police forces, and some material exceeding standard “official” classification, meaning it may sit at “secret” or “top secret” level.

The assessment was clear. It said Microsoft software had vulnerabilities that could eventually be exploited by cybercriminals and other attackers. It also pointed to a more specific and worrying risk: “US government insiders.”

“In doing so, officers accepted that “US government insiders” would be able to see the data, and that it could be “transmitted worldwide”, with “the extent of this … unknown”. According to five specialists who reviewed the Guardian’s findings, the risks identified in that document persist today. Almost every UK police force now depends on Microsoft Azure, and the UK government spends at least £1.9bn on Microsoft software each year.”” states The Guardian.

“There is a risk of compromise of sensitive data shared by, or taken from, Microsoft by the US government being released by US government insider attackers.” reads the document.

This wasn’t a general concern. It was a specific threat identified eight years ago by the official responsible for data-handling standards in British policing. Five experts who reviewed the same assessment for The Guardian said the risks are still relevant today.

The proposed protections were fairly simple: use Microsoft’s built-in encryption, keep servers updated and let individual police chiefs decide whether to use the service. But experts interviewed by The Guardian, including Microsoft engineers, said encryption does not prevent Microsoft employees from accessing the data. They also said it would not necessarily prevent the US government from obtaining it.

Which is exactly the geography problem Dave Michels, a researcher at Queen Mary University of London’s Cloud Legal Project, pointed to. Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure spans over 100 countries, and pieces of a single file can end up stored across several of them, Sweden to Ethiopia, for instance. Microsoft has started offering EU customers assurances that data stays within European borders, but Michels called the whole focus on data location somewhat beside the point, since the people who can access the data matter more than the servers holding it.

Legally, the situation becomes more complicated. Under the US CLOUD Act, American authorities can require US-based companies to provide data they control, even when that data is stored outside the United States. In some cases, companies can also be prevented from telling the customer about the request.

Microsoft, Amazon and Google have said they would challenge such requests when possible. But, as international law professor Douwe Korff pointed out:

“The risk is obvious, even though the providers of the cloud and the government both have an interest in talking it down” Douwe Korff, professor of international law told The Guardian.

Which brings us to the part that reads like a contradiction under pressure. Police officials told the Guardian the data stays in the UK and that Microsoft can’t share it without permission. Microsoft, meanwhile, told Police Scotland back in 2023 that data can leave the UK and that it cannot guarantee data sovereignty. Those two statements aren’t compatible, and nobody seems eager to reconcile them out loud.

Every single UK police force has now put its data, wholly or partly, on Microsoft’s cloud, despite all of this being on record since 2017. One former senior policing source summed up the current state of visibility pretty starkly:

“All the security guys I worked with when this policy came in expected a big breach by now, and we know it will take that to change the police’s position.” a source told The Guardian. “The truth is, however, the level of logging and information in the cloud systems would not necessarily tell us if there was a problem. We really don’t know if the data has been breached or not.”

That’s the key point. It’s not saying, “we checked and everything is fine,” or “there has been no incident.” It’s saying that the available logs and monitoring might not detect a breach even if one happened.

For anyone responsible for sensitive data in a large cloud environment, that’s an important warning. In a security assessment, saying “we would probably know if something went wrong” isn’t enough without evidence that the monitoring can actually detect it.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Microsoft Azure)

Exclusive: Official UK security assessment found Microsoft cloud platform storing files was at potential risk from hostile hackers

Vast troves of highly sensitive police data are lying on Microsoft cloud platforms which an official UK security assessment deemed to be vulnerable to “compromise” by foreign actors and the US government, a Guardian investigation can reveal.

The files include criminal records, victim statements, internal emails and sensitive information held by more than 40 police forces across the UK.

Continue reading...

© Illustration: Guardian Design/Getty

© Illustration: Guardian Design/Getty

© Illustration: Guardian Design/Getty

What Happened

• In mid-2026, an emerging cybercriminal group known as ExfilSquad launched a high-profile extortion campaign targeting prominent UK organisations across the public sector, education, and law enforcement, as well as other firms worldwide.
• Unlike traditional ransomware groups, ExfilSquad does not deploy encryptors or destructive malware. Instead, they operate as a pure data extortion group, stealing data and threatening to publish it on their onion-based Data Leak Site (DLS) if a ransom is not paid.
• Several prominent UK entities have confirmed breaches linked to the group:
• UK Department for Education (DfE): Approximately 600,000 records stolen from its Help Portal containing parent and staff contact details (names, emails, phone numbers, job titles), plus around 7,000 records from the Turing Portal.
• Police National Legal Database (PNLD): Stole 1.9 GB of data (around 135,000 records) containing contact information for over 100,000 serving police officers, staff, and criminal justice professionals, alongside around 21,000 "Ask the Police" public inquiry records.
• Newcastle University: Approximately 440,000 records compromised containing applicant and student contact information, personally identifiable information (PII), and admissions database records caused by a technical configuration flaw connecting to an admissions system.
• Analysis of the details left on the data leak site revealed that ExfilSquad's primary attack vector involves exploiting misconfigurations in cloud portals, customer relationship management (CRM) platforms, internal case management systems, as well as Microsoft Power Pages data tables left publicly accessible without proper authentication.
• To force compliance and prove their claims are real, ExfilSquad uploaded multi-gigabyte torrent files for each victim to their TOR leak site. Resecurity noted that ExfilSquad assigns a distinct Torrent Tracker and initial Web Seed per victim.

Analyst Comment

While ExfilSquad is a new group, they appear to be already experienced at running these types of attacks, suggesting they have a history of cybercrime. Plus, ExfilSquad’s recent campaign highlights the growing trend of transitioning from file-encrypting ransomware to extortion driven entirely by cloud and SaaS misconfigurations. Organisations that have invested in defending against endpoint-based threats are often leaving critical business application interfaces exposed.

SaaS platforms continue to be primary targets of English-speaking cybercrime communities. In recent years,  customers of major SaaS providers, such as Salesloft, Salesforce, and Snowflake have all been extorted. Microsoft Power Pages portals, CRM databases, and customer support helpdesks frequently hold vast repositories of sensitive contact data and interaction histories. When internet-facing API endpoints or data table permissions are left unauthenticated or unpatched, cybercriminals can systematically scrape massive volumes of data without ever needing to drop a payload or escalate privileges internally.

ExfilSquad’s reliance on torrent distribution further amplifies reputational and operational damage. While gangs like LockBit, Clop, and Akira have previously utilised torrents, ExfilSquad’s operational twist of assigning unique Torrent Trackers and dedicated Web Seeds to individual victims ensures that leaked files distribute rapidly across P2P networks, making it extremely difficult to perform a takedown.

While ExfilSquad’s breaches have largely compromised contact directories and administrative support records, the real-world risks remain significant. Exposing work emails, names, and organisational structures for over 100,000 police officers and civil servants poses distinct social engineering, spear-phishing, and physical security concerns that impacted institutions will have to manage long after the breach occurs.

Defensive Takeaways

• Audit Microsoft Power Pages and Public SaaS Tables: Regularly review public data table permissions, web API settings, and unauthenticated browser views across Microsoft Power Pages, CRMs, and customer support portals to ensure backend data tables are not exposed to the public internet.
• Harden CRM and Case Management Integrations: Treat external-facing admissions portals, helpdesks, and case management systems as high-risk platforms. Implement strict access controls, conduct routine configuration audits, and enforce proper API token security.
• Deploy External Attack Surface Management (EASM): Utilise continuous external attack surface scanning to detect newly exposed web endpoints, misconfigured database connectors, and publicly exposed storage buckets before malicious actors locate them.
• Incorporate Pure Extortion into Incident Response Plans: Security teams must adapt incident response playbooks for data-theft-only scenarios. Organisations may seek to establish protocols for monitoring peer-to-peer (P2P) networks and managing public disclosures when stolen data is distributed via torrents.

Relevant Sources

1. https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2026/security/newcastle-university-data-breach-exfilsquad
2. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/who-are-exfilsquad-hackers-cyberattacks-dtzhvvzgj
3. https://www.ncl.ac.uk/press/articles/latest/2026/07/statementonpotentialunauthoriseddataaccess/
4. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq6dmgrp21po
5. https://www.pnld.co.uk/article/?id=7ebf3c0e-598e-f111-8077-7ced8d3aa78f

Relevant CTI Sources

1. https://www.ransomware.live/group/ExfilSquad
2. https://www.resecurity.com/blog/article/exfilsquad-targets-new-victims-shares-data-via-torrents
3. https://socradar.io/blog/dark-web-profile-exfilsquad/
4. https://www.sans.org/blog/hunting-saas-threats-insights-for589-course-cybercriminal-campaigns

What Happened

• On 7 August 2026, the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) disclosed that between July 2021 and June 2023, the ACRO Criminal Records Office suffered three separate compromises involving its customer portal website (acro.police.uk).
• ACRO is a national police unit providing public services such as issuing Police Certificates, International Child Protection Certificates, and processing Subject Access Requests.
• In March 2023, ACRO was notified about an SQL injection attack that reportedly exposed 15 sets of credentials, the majority of which belonged to its employees.
• A subsequent forensic investigation uncovered long-term threat actor activity within the website's environment, spanning from 9 July 2021 to 22 June 2023.
• The website was built on the Kentico CMS and was running version 12.0.0 between September 2019 and March 2023. This version had multiple known vulnerabilities at the time of the incident, but suffered from ambiguity around who was accountable for patching led to missed hotfixes and updates.
• Between 15 and 16 February 2023, an unknown threat actor staged personal data for exfiltration, which included Police Certificate Applications, Subject Access Request (SAR) forms, and International Child Protection Certificate forms.
• Due to insufficient log retention, ACRO could not definitively determine if the data was successfully exfiltrated. A maximum of 10,920 data subjects had their data staged, but ACRO ultimately notified 84,048 data subjects on a precautionary basis in April 2023.
• Notably, on 23 February 2023, the ICO learned that ACRO's Trend Micro antivirus software detected and quarantined four attempts to install the well-known credential harvesting tool Mimikatz. However, because ACRO operated without a documented patching policy and lacked a structured process for analyzing security alerts, these warnings were never reviewed or acted upon.

A usage policy for Flock license plate reader cameras tells police not to talk about the cameras:

When cops use Flock to arrest someone in Wapello County, Iowa, they don’t want them to know. A usage policy for the automated license plate reader cameras in the county tells police, in no uncertain terms, to keep them a secret: “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE VEHICLE,” the policy document reads. “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE IN YOUR REPORT OR COMPLAINT UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.”

This reminds me of IMSI-catchers (Stingray was the most popular) a couple of decades ago. Police would go to even more extremes to hide their usage.

What Happened

• New data published by the City of London Police in June 2026 reveals that courier fraud losses exceeded £21 million in 2025, with individuals aged over 70 being heavily targeted. The highest concentration of these offenses was recorded in London and the Home Counties.
• Cybercriminals and fraud syndicates are actively evolving their operational tactics, increasingly pivoting to messaging platforms like WhatsApp to contact their victims and remotely paying for third-party courier services to facilitate physical collections.
• UK law enforcement also highlighted a dangerous shift in 2025 toward high-value physical goods. Victims are being systematically manipulated into visiting multiple jewellers over an extended period to purchase gold and expensive jewellery, which they then hand directly to fraud couriers.

Recent operational crackdowns by UK Regional Organised Crime Units (ROCUs) showcase the nationwide scale of these networks:

• North West ROCU Operations (July 2026): Police executed coordinated search warrants in Huddersfield and Manchester, arresting two men (aged 21 and 25) on suspicion of Conspiracy to Defraud and Money Laundering. In this specific series, the suspects impersonated bank fraud departments, convinced a victim her card was compromised, sent a courier to collect it, and immediately exploit the physical card to make numerous fraudulent transactions.
• North East ROCU (NEROCU) Sentencing (June 2026): A complex, cross-country courier fraud operation spanning March to May 2022 concluded with a prison sentence for a primary operative. The network targeted 14 separate victims, convincing them to hand over physical bank cards and PIN numbers under the guise of an internal "investigation" by their bank's fraud department. The group scammed a total of £56,000, which was then rapidly laundered through the high street purchase of smartphones, designer clothing, and luxury jewellery.

Analyst Comment

Courier fraud is effectively a hybrid cyber-physical social engineering campaign. While the final phase relies on a physical courier arriving at a victim’s doorstep, the initial approach relies heavily on psychological manipulation and email, message, or phone call-based deception.

This type of fraud is notable as it follows a structured cybercriminal playbook that bypasses detection systems and takes advantage of the vulnerable in society. The victim is instructed to bypass normal banking security controls by withdrawing cash, disclosing sensitive credentials (like PINs), or purchasing high-value physical commodities like gold or luxury jewellery. This makes it difficult to proactively detect and prevent.

The other concerning factor is the couriers themselves. According to reports, they can be an unwitting third-party courier service that is paid to go to the victim's home to collect the assets. Online services enable cybercriminals to organise these pickups remotely, lowering their risk of being caught.

The £21 million sizeable loss metric from 2025 shows how profitable this low-tech, high manipulation vector remains. The recent shift to targeting gold and luxury jewellery is a deliberate evasion tactic against traditional anti-money laundering (AML) and banking fraud detection algorithms. While banks have grown adept at flagging unusual rapid bank transfers, they cannot easily stop an account holder from physically withdrawing funds or using a card over several days at different brick-and-mortar luxury retailers. This tactic serves as a highly liquid physical laundering pipeline for these syndicates that remains a challenge to prevent.

Defensive Takeaways

• Implement Bank Transfer and Purchase Outlier Alerts: Financial institutions can focus on further behavioural monitoring for elderly demographics, looking specifically for sudden, consecutive high-value transactions at physical luxury retail or jewellery establishments and flag patterns on unusual activity for review.
• Public Awareness on Cross-Media Scams: Security awareness campaigns must make it clear that legitimate institutions, specifically the Police and Banking Fraud teams, will never send a courier to a residential address to collect cash, PIN numbers, bank cards, or purchased items.
• Vetting of Courier Logistics: Commercial courier services are increasingly being abused as infrastructure by these threat groups. Logistics firms must implement logging and analysis systems to detect unusual residential pickups booked via suspicious accounts and forged identities.

Relevant Sources

1. https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2026/june/over-70s-targeted-as-courier-fraud-exceeds-21-million-in-2025-with-london-and-home-counties-hit-hardest/
2. https://www.rocu.police.uk/news/2026/july/two-suspected-fraudsters-arrested-after-cross-border-strikes/
3. https://www.rocu.police.uk/news/2026/june/a-courier-fraud-conman-has-been-jailed/

Graham gets a phone call from the police. Well, someone who sounds convincingly like the police. There's just one small problem: what they really want is the 24-word seed key to Graham's cryptocurrency wallet. Meanwhile, if you've stayed in a hotel recently, the free Wi-Fi you connected to might have come with an unexpected extra: an all-you-can-eat buffet of "Captive Crunch" for a Russian intelligence-linked hacking group. And a group calling itself the "ExFilSquad" has walked off with 600,000 records of the UK's teachers and head teachers from the Department for Education — sending an unusually polite ransom demand. All this and more in episode 479 of the "Smashing Security" podcast with cybersecurity expert and keynote speaker Graham Cluley, and special guest Danny Palmer.

The PNLD data breach has exposed contact information belonging to police officers, government partners, criminal justice professionals and customers after data from the Police National Legal Database (PNLD) was published on the dark web. The data breach at PNLD, identified on July 26, 2026, also affected some users of Ask the Police, raising concerns about targeted phishing attacks. 

PNLD Data Breach Exposes Police and Contact Details 

According to PNLD, the compromised data includes names, organizations and work email addresses of police officers, police staff, criminal justice professionals, government partners and customers. The incident also exposed the names and email addresses of some individuals who had previously submitted questions through Ask the Police. UK government guidance warns that such information could enable attackers to craft more convincing phishing emails targeting named officers and affected individuals.  In its official statement, PNLD said, "There is no evidence to suggest that passwords or other security credentials have been compromised." The organisation clarified that it provides legal information, products and services to UK police forces and criminal justice organisations. It also stressed that PNLD is not the Police National Computer or the Police National Database, is not a crime-recording system, and does not store confidential information relating to victims, witnesses or offenders. 

PNLD Notifies Authorities and Affected Users 

Following the PNLD data breach, the organization said it had contacted all affected organizations and provided additional guidance. Individuals impacted through Ask the Police have also received notification emails with further information PNLD confirmed that it has informed the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and is working with the National Crime Agency (NCA) and specialist cybersecurity organizations as the investigation continues.  Its statement noted: "We are continuing to investigate a data security incident affecting the Police National Legal Database (PNLD), which was identified on Sunday 26 July." It added that compromised information had been published on the dark web and reiterated that there is no evidence that passwords or other security credentials were accessed.  Regarding Ask the Police, PNLD said the platform was affected because it is hosted on the same infrastructure, resulting in the publication of some users' names and email addresses. 

Investigation Continues as Key Questions Remain 

As of August 3, 2026, PNLD had not disclosed how many people were affected by the data breach at PNLD, when the intrusion began, how long unauthorized access lasted or the total volume of data obtained. Its public breach notice lists the categories of exposed information but does not include a victim count.  PNLD's 2025-26 annual summary reported 108,429 police registrations and support for all 43 Home Office police forces. However, the organization emphasized that this figure represents its user base and should not be interpreted as the number of people affected by the breach.  The organization's 2023-24 annual summary stated that PNLD uses Microsoft Power Platform technology. On August 3, 2026, The Hacker News reported that the breach notification page referenced assets hosted on Microsoft's content.powerapps.com domain. While this supports the platform connection, it does not indicate how the attackers accessed or extracted the compromised data. 

Details of parents and staff, including email addresses and phone numbers, are among data taken by cybercriminals

The Department for Education and a police database have been targeted by a cyber-attack, exposing more than 740,000 pieces of data.

Details of government officials, senior school leaders, university staff, police officers and members of the public have been taken by hackers.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Dave Hunt/AAP

© Photograph: Dave Hunt/AAP

© Photograph: Dave Hunt/AAP

What Happened

Nemesis Dark Web Drug Dealers Arrested

• On 14 May 2026, two Cambridgeshire drug dealers were sentenced after being arrested in July 2024 by the Eastern Region Special Operations Unit (ERSOU).
• ERSOU officers recovered Royal Mail parcel labels, order lists, Gorgonites-branded packaging, and a USB memory stick containing login credentials for multiple dark web marketplace accounts.
• The dealers reportedly used the dark web to supply heroin, cocaine, and amphetamine to hundreds of users across the UK.
• The drug deals were initially arranged via a Telegram channel under the handle Gorgonites, which was linked to at least 570 individual sales on Nemesis Market since September 2023.

AEGIS Dark Web Drug Market Seizure

• On 17 March 2026, the London Metropolitan Police’s Cyber Crime Unit announced the seizure of AEGIS Marketplace.
• In June 2025, the Met Cyber Crime Unit became aware of AEGIS Marketplace, which was a site where individual sellers could market drugs for sale to users who could make purchases using cryptocurrency.
• By March 2026, the website had 30 active sellers and was estimated to have generated 10,000 drug sales in ten months, leading to an estimated annual turnover of almost £2 million.
• Officers from the Met managed to infiltrate the site, retrieving server data that led to the identification of administrators, sellers and customers.

Online Killers Marketplace (OKM) Admins Arrested

• On 19 January 2026, two suspects were arrested in Romania as part of an ERSOU investigation into a bogus ‘harm-for-hire’ website which offered services including murder.
• The arrests were connected to a dark web scam website called Online Killers Marketplace (OKM), which purported to facilitate criminal activities including the hiring of hitmen and extortion.
• ERSOU noted that even though none of the services OKM offered were genuine, successful prosecutions have previously been pursued by police forces of individuals attempting to use it to cause harm to others.
• The investigation led to the seizure of US crypto currency worth at least $600,000, as well as cash which included almost €50,000 Euros, and around £48,000 worth of Romanian Leu.

Analyst Comment

The anonymity and connectivity of encrypted messaging apps, the Tor network, cryptocurrency, and online marketplaces makes it nearly impossible to prevent such crime. However, law enforcement can achieve strategic containment by targeting specific infrastructure for seizure and individuals for arrest. These activities support the overall strategy for national law enforcement agencies is to deter criminals from being active in their country.

Telegram is increasingly used as a front-end service for all sorts of cybercrime activities. As seen in the Nemesis investigation, the dealers operated a Telegram channel under the handle Gorgonites to coordinate and funnel buyers toward more secure transactions. It is an easy-to-use mobile application that makes access to such illicit services simple for buyers. It is more accessible than having to download the Tor browser and use a desktop or laptop browser. Many of these illicit services also would not exist without cryptocurrency. The ability to send funds via peer-to-peer networks and obfuscate transactions continues to be the main enabling factor for most cybercrime operations. 

Interestingly, the sole administrator of Nemesis Market was sanctioned in March 2025 by the US Treasury OFAC department. The admin was an Iran-based individual named Behrouz Parsarad. Prior to its takedown by law enforcement in March 2024, Nemesis had over 30,000 active users and 1,000 vendors and facilitated the sale of nearly $30 million USD worth of drugs around the world between 2021 and 2024.

Defensive Takeaways

• Blockchain Analytics: While cryptocurrency provides a layer of perceived anonymity for illicit markets it also leaves a permanent, public ledger. Law enforcement and threat intelligence firms, such as TRM Labs and Chainalysis, can leverage blockchain analytics to follow the money and deanonymise the administrators. By mapping transaction inputs and outputs, investigators can trace mixed funds, identify exchanges used to cash out into fiat currency, and map the financial infrastructure of a marketplace.
• Breach Data Pivoting: To catch these cybercriminals, threat intelligence analysts can use historical breach data repositories to pivot from a known dark web alias or leaked credential to find a real-world identity. If an administrator used the same password or a variation of a username on a compromised gaming forum ten years ago, that footprint can blow their operational security (OPSEC).
• Profile Scraping: Dark web vendors and market admins often leave massive digital footprints across forums, marketplaces, and messaging apps like Telegram. Continuous profile scraping can be achieve via automated bots to collect vendor profiles, feedback ratings, PGP keys, styles of writing (stylometry), and active hours. By aggregating this data over time, defenders can create a comprehensive profile of a target and identify them.
• Dark Web Market Sock Puppet Accounts: Law enforcement and threat intelligence analysts can deploy sock puppets accounts, which are undercover, synthetic personas, into these dark web ecosystems. These accounts are kept for long periods of time and actively posting in an attempt to build trust within the cybercrime underground. Investigators can use them to buy products, interact with admins, and gain access to private vendor portals or escrow systems to support evidence gathering for a takedown.
• Infrastructure Analysis: As dark web markets rely on servers, hosting providers, DNS, and Tor is is possible to analyse these attributes and look for configuration mistakes. This can include exposed IP addresses, trackable X509 certificates, or open port banners that reveal the true location of a hidden service. Once a server's true IP is uncovered, law enforcement can issue subpoenas to hosting providers or execute physical raids to seize the hardware and unmask administrators, vendors, and buyer databases.

Relevant Sources

1. https://www.rocu.police.uk/news/2026/may/dark-web-was-used-to-supply-heroin-and-cocaine-to-hundreds-of-users-across-uk/
2. https://web.archive.org/web/20260320135505/https://news.met.police.uk/news/met-seizes-website-making-millions-in-drug-sales-507234
3. https://www.rocu.police.uk/news/2026/january/dark-web-arrests-in-romania-linked-to-portal-which-offered-services-including-murder/

Related CTI Sources

1. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0040
2. https://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/notorious-nemesis-market-zapped-video-game-loving-german-police

 What Happened

• Officers from the Dedicated Card and Payment Crime Unit (DCPCU), jointly run by the London Met Police and City of London Police, secured the conviction of a man who used an SMS Blaster device to send fraudulent text messages as part of an organised criminal operation in London.
• The conviction relates to an investigation that previously led to the sentencing of Ruichen Xiong in July 2025, who was apprehended while driving a vehicle in North London as the device was in operation. During that incident, officers in the vicinity received fraudulent text messages purporting to be from HMRC.
• Ruichen Xiong was a student from China who drove around London using the SMS Blaster between 22 and 27 March 2025, sending messages to tens of thousands of potential victims.
• Following Xiong’s arrest and subsequent conviction, enquiries identified another individual called Di Li who was a key organiser. Li facilitated Xiong’s involvement by arranging access to the device, assisting with obtaining a vehicle, and supporting his day-to-day living costs.
• Xiong had accrued significant gambling debts after arriving in the UK as a student. To pay off his debts, Li instructed that he could repay what he owed by driving routes in a car with the SMS Blaster.
• On 20 August 2025, officers searched Li’s home address, where digital evidence was recovered showing communications between Li and Xiong relating to the deployment of the SMS blaster. Li was arrested on 1 September 2025 and charged with offences linked to the operation.
• At the court trial, Li’s defence was that the device was intended for “advertising” purposes and described himself as a middleman acting on behalf of an individual based in China. He maintained that he had been merely attempting to help Xiong repay his debts.

Analyst Comment

An SMS Blaster acts as a portable mobile phone mast that forces nearby mobile devices to connect to it by silently downgrading it to 2G while they try to connect to 5G or LTE. By doing so, criminals can bypass safeguards designed to block malicious senders and harmful links, enabling them to deliver fraudulent messages directly to victims nearby without needing their phone numbers. The SMS Blaster allow an operator to customise all aspects of the messages, so they can make it look like it has come from a genuine organisation like HMRC, the UK tax authority.

SMS Blasters are a relatively new technology for scammers. Police in the UK only encountered them for the first time in 2025, but they have been used in other parts of the world. SMS Blaster are also a type of IMSI catcher that mirrors the capability of law enforcement tools such as a Stingray.

When used in busy metropolitan areas, they allow criminals to easily send out SMS phishing messages to hundreds of people at a time. These SMS messages typically have a malicious link that host scam websites that trick victims into entering their personal details. These details can then used by fraudsters to make payments, steal funds, or resell it to others.

This report also highlights the concerning trend of organised cybercrime gangs from China are actively hunting for individuals who are financially vulnerable (like students with gambling debts) to conduct high-risk in-person operations. 

Defensive Takeaways

• Block and Report: If you receive a suspicious text message, do not engage with it. Instead, forward it to 7726, a free reporting service, and block the number.
• Move Away from SMS: If your organisation relies on SMS for One-Time Passcodes (OTPs), this threat highlights that the SMS sender ID can be perfectly spoofed locally. Organisations should migrate to authenticator apps, hardware tokens, or application push notifications to avoid spoofing.
• Proactive Takedown Programs: Since the attack relies on hosting malicious links to harvest credentials, defenders can perform proactive domain monitoring. Detecting and taking down lookalike domains immediately minimises the impact.

Relevant Sources

1. https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2026/june/man-jailed-for-role-in-sms-blaster-fraud-operation-following-city-of-london-police-investigation
2. https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/news-and-insight/press-release/police-warn-sms-scams-following-prison-sentence-criminal-who
3. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/jun/24/police-sms-scams-blaster-texts-smishing

Relevant CTI Resources

1. https://www.m3aawg.org/blog/SMSBlasterEngagementSeries